» Articles » PMID: 32489329

Comparative Analysis of Enoxaparin Versus Rivaroxaban in the Treatment of Cancer Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre

Overview
Journal Thromb J
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Jun 4
PMID 32489329
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. While newer data on use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) is promising; its data is still few and inconsistent across literature. We designed the study to assess if rivaroxaban would be an appealing alternate choice to treat CAT.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin in cancer patients after developing a symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Baseline patient characteristics and laboratory values were assessed in each arm. Primary efficacy outcome was measured by radiographically confirmed VTE recurrence at different intervals. Primary safety outcome was measured by presence of major and minor bleeding using the ISTH scale.

Results: Our study recruited 150 cancer patients with radiologically confirmed DVT and PE; 80 patients were evaluated in enoxaparin arm and 70 patients in rivaroxaban arm. Our results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the incidence of VTE recurrence at 6 months between the enoxaparin and rivaroxaban arm (10% vs 14.2%,  = 0.42). Historically significant risk factors for VTE in cancer patients such as high platelet count, high leukocyte count, low hemoglobin level, high risk gastrointestinal, genitourinary and lung cancers were not found to be significantly associated with the risk of VTE recurrence. Primary safety outcome analysis also showed no statistically significant difference in major (11.2% vs 11.4%) and minor (15% vs 10%) bleeding between enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban arm respectively ( = 0.65).

Conclusion: We conclude that there was no significant difference seen between the efficacy and safety profile of enoxaparin and rivaroxaban in our cancer patient population.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in preventing venous thromboembolism in postoperative patients with gynecological malignancies: protocol for a randomised controlled open-label trial (G-alfalfa trial).

Wei T, Zhou H, Wu S, He F, Yi H, Zhang J BMJ Open. 2025; 14(12):e092164.

PMID: 39806649 PMC: 11667254. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092164.


Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Relation to Location: A Retrospective Analysis Study.

Al Yami M, Alshehri A, Alotaibi G, Alsulimani M, Alotaibi F, Alotaibi R Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025; 31():10760296241313055.

PMID: 39782527 PMC: 11713955. DOI: 10.1177/10760296241313055.


Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for preventing venous thromboembolism in hospitalized cancer patients: a national multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Wu S, Wang H, Li C, Tao J, Zhu X, Dai H Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1373635.

PMID: 39035988 PMC: 11257898. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1373635.


Effectiveness and safety of continuous low-molecular-weight heparin versus switching to direct oral anticoagulants in cancer-associated venous thrombosis.

Kang W, Huang C, Yan V, Wei Y, Shami J, Li S Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5657.

PMID: 38969649 PMC: 11229502. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50037-1.


Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban Versus Enoxaparin in Prevention of Recurrence of Venous Thrombo-Embolism Events in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Awan A, Ahmad A, Daniyal M, Khan M, Saeed S, Siddiqui M Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024; 30:10760296241261364.

PMID: 38870350 PMC: 11179539. DOI: 10.1177/10760296241261364.


References
1.
Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar A, Mismetti P, Schellong S, Eriksson H . Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(24):2342-52. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906598. View

2.
Martinez B, Sheth J, Patel N, Baker W, Coleman C . Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies Evaluating Rivaroxaban for Cancer-Associated Venous Thrombosis. Pharmacotherapy. 2018; 38(6):610-618. DOI: 10.1002/phar.2113. View

3.
Schulman S, Kakkar A, Goldhaber S, Schellong S, Eriksson H, Mismetti P . Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis. Circulation. 2013; 129(7):764-72. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004450. View

4.
Key N, Khorana A, Kuderer N, Bohlke K, Lee A, Arcelus J . Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 38(5):496-520. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01461. View

5.
Kuderer N, Lyman G . Guidelines for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism among patients with cancer. Thromb Res. 2014; 133 Suppl 2:S122-7. PMC: 4358787. DOI: 10.1016/S0049-3848(14)50021-7. View