» Articles » PMID: 30127566

The Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Dalteparin in the Treatment of Cancer Associated Venous Thrombosis

Overview
Specialty Hematology
Date 2018 Aug 22
PMID 30127566
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complication of malignancy that is associated with significant mortality. The CLOT trial showed superiority of dalteparin in comparison to warfarin in preventing VTE recurrence. Rivaroxaban has been approved for treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). In the absence of large randomized trials in the oncology population, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE in cancer patients needs to be assessed. A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with dalteparin in cancer-associated thrombosis. Out of 671 patients identified, 286 patients (107 in the rivaroxaban group and 179 in the dalteparin group) were eligible for analysis. The rivaroxaban group had a rate of VTE recurrence at 6 months of 4.9 versus 11.1% with dalteparin ( = 0.252). The incidence of recurrent DVT at 6 months was lower in patients treated with rivaroxaban (0%) compared with dalteparin (8.2%) at 6 months ( = 0.025). Incidence of recurrent PE in the rivaroxaban group (5%) versus dalteparin group (3.1%) at 6 months was not statistically significant ( = 0.675). No significant difference was identified between the rivaroxaban group and dalteparin group in the rate of major bleeding (2.8 vs. 1.1%, respectively). Rivaroxaban was comparable to dalteparin in prevention of VTE recurrence while having no significant differences with major or minor bleeding.

Citing Articles

Rivaroxaban for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.

Liang B, Liang Y, Zhao L, Zhao Y, Gu N Sci Prog. 2021; 104(2):368504211012160.

PMID: 33913387 PMC: 10454885. DOI: 10.1177/00368504211012160.


The Net Clinical Benefit of Rivaroxaban Compared to Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohamed M, ElShafei M, Ahmed M, Abdalla L, Ahmed I, Elzouki A Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021; 27:1076029620940046.

PMID: 33651658 PMC: 7930650. DOI: 10.1177/1076029620940046.


Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Song X, Liu Z, Zeng R, Shao J, Liu B, Zheng Y Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(2):162.

PMID: 33569464 PMC: 7867886. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-8156.


Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre.

Faqah A, Sheikh H, Bakar M, Tayyaab F, Khawaja S Thromb J. 2020; 18:8.

PMID: 32489329 PMC: 7245926. DOI: 10.1186/s12959-020-00221-2.


Direct versus conventional anticoagulants for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis: a pooled and interaction analysis between observational studies and randomized clinical trials.

Gu Z, Yan Y, Yang S, Shen L, Kong L, Zhang C Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(4):95.

PMID: 32175388 PMC: 7049023. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.152.


References
1.
Di Nisio M, Ferrante N, De Tursi M, Iacobelli S, Cuccurullo F, Buller H . Incidental venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Thromb Haemost. 2010; 104(5):1049-54. DOI: 10.1160/TH10-05-0277. View

2.
White R . The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003; 107(23 Suppl 1):I4-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078468.11849.66. View

3.
Prins M, Lensing A, Brighton T, Lyons R, Rehm J, Trajanovic M . Oral rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin with vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer (EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE): a pooled subgroup analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Haematol. 2016; 1(1):e37-46. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(14)70018-3. View

4.
Lee A, Kamphuisen P, Meyer G, Bauersachs R, Janas M, Jarner M . Tinzaparin vs Warfarin for Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Active Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 314(7):677-686. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.9243. View

5.
Lee A, Levine M . Venous thromboembolism and cancer: risks and outcomes. Circulation. 2003; 107(23 Suppl 1):I17-21. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078466.72504.AC. View