» Articles » PMID: 32474468

Head-to-Head Comparison of 18F-Florbetaben and 18F-Flutemetamol in the Cortical and Striatal Regions

Abstract

Background: 18F-florbetaben (FBB) and 18F-flutemetamol (FMM) amyloid PET have been developed and approved for clinical use. It is important to understand the distinct features of these ligands to compare and correctly interpret the results of different amyloid PET studies.

Objective: We performed a head-to-head comparison of FBB and FMM to compare with regard to imaging characteristics, including dynamic range of retention, and differences in quantitative measurements between the two ligands in cortical, striatal, and white matter (WM) regions.

Methods: Paired FBB and FMM PET images were acquired in 107 participants. Correlations of FBB and FMM amyloid deposition in the cortex, striatum, and WM were investigated and compared in different reference regions (cerebellar gray matter (CG), whole cerebellum (WC), WC with brainstem (WC + B), and pons).

Results: The cortical SUVR (R2 = 0.97) and striatal SUVR (R2 = 0.95) demonstrated an excellent linear correlation between FBB and FMM using a WC as reference region. There was no difference in the cortical SUVR ratio between the two ligands (p = 0.90), but the striatal SUVR ratio was higher in FMM than in FBB (p < 0.001). Also, the effect size of differences in striatal SUVR seemed to be higher with FMM (2.61) than with FBB (2.34). These trends were similarly observed according to four different reference regions (CG, WC, WC + B, and pons).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that FMM might be better than FBB to detect amyloid burden in the striatum, although both ligands are comparable for imaging AD pathology in vivo.

Citing Articles

Building Multivariate Molecular Imaging Brain Atlases Using the NeuroMark PET Independent Component Analysis Framework.

Eierud C, Norgaard M, Bilgel M, Petropoulos H, Fu Z, Iraji A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027837 PMC: 11870563. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.18.638362.


Comparison of accumulation rates of beta-amyloid tracers and their relationship with cognitive changes.

Cho S, Kang H, Ham H, Moon S, Jang H, Yun J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7072.

PMID: 40016250 PMC: 11868567. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90642-8.


Association between focal amyloid deposition and cognitive impairment in individuals below the amyloid threshold.

Ham H, Kim B, Lee E, Shin D, Jang H, Kang S Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1452081.

PMID: 39539457 PMC: 11557402. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1452081.


Imaging of Tauopathies with PET Ligands: State of the Art and Future Outlook.

Conte M, De Feo M, Sidrak M, Corica F, Gorica J, Granese G Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37238166 PMC: 10217406. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13101682.


Clinical outcomes of increased focal amyloid uptake in individuals with subthreshold global amyloid levels.

Kim J, Choe Y, Park Y, Kim Y, Kim J, Jang H Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1124445.

PMID: 36936497 PMC: 10017468. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1124445.


References
1.
Rowe C, Ackerman U, Browne W, Mulligan R, Pike K, OKeefe G . Imaging of amyloid beta in Alzheimer's disease with 18F-BAY94-9172, a novel PET tracer: proof of mechanism. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7(2):129-35. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2. View

2.
Schmidt M, Chiao P, Klein G, Matthews D, Thurfjell L, Cole P . The influence of biological and technical factors on quantitative analysis of amyloid PET: Points to consider and recommendations for controlling variability in longitudinal data. Alzheimers Dement. 2014; 11(9):1050-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.09.004. View

3.
Landau S, Breault C, Joshi A, Pontecorvo M, Mathis C, Jagust W . Amyloid-β imaging with Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir: comparing radiotracers and quantification methods. J Nucl Med. 2012; 54(1):70-7. PMC: 3747730. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.109009. View

4.
Cho S, Shin J, Jang H, Park S, Kim H, Kim S . Amyloid involvement in subcortical regions predicts cognitive decline. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; 45(13):2368-2376. PMC: 6439472. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4081-5. View

5.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):273-89. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. View