» Articles » PMID: 32473569

Detection of CtDNA with Personalized Molecular Barcode NGS and Its Clinical Significance in Patients with Early Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Transl Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 May 31
PMID 32473569
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We attempted to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), taking advantage of molecular barcode next-generation sequencing (MB-NGS), which can be more easily customized to detect a variety of mutations with a high sensitivity than PCR-based methods. Sequencing with a gene panel consisting of the 13 most frequently mutated genes in breast tumors from stage I or II patients revealed 95 somatic mutations in the 12 genes in 62% (62/100) of tumors. Then, plasma DNA from each patient (n = 62) before surgery was analyzed via MB-NGS customized to each somatic mutation, resulting in the detection of ctDNA in 16.1% (10/62) of patients. ctDNA was significantly associated with biologically aggressive phenotypes, including large tumor size (P = .004), positive lymph node (P = .009), high histological grade (P < .001), negative ER (P = .018), negative PR (P = .017), and positive HER2 (P = .046). Furthermore, distant disease-free survival was significantly worse in patients with ctDNA (n = 10) than those without ctDNA (n = 52) (P < .001). Our results demonstrate that MB-NGS personalized to each mutation can detect ctDNA with a high sensitivity in early breast cancer patients at diagnosis, and it seems to have a potential to serve as a clinically useful tumor marker for predicting their prognosis.

Citing Articles

Beyond traditional biopsies: the emerging role of ctDNA and MRD on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Sabit H, Attia M, Mohamed N, Taha P, Ahmed N, Osama S Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):271.

PMID: 40050490 PMC: 11885725. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01940-6.


The prognostic role of circulating tumor DNA across breast cancer molecular subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guo N, Zhou Q, Zhang M, Chen X, Zeng B, Wu S J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 4(2):153-161.

PMID: 39282586 PMC: 11390625. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.04.005.


Circulating tumor DNA as prognostic markers of relapsed breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guo N, Zhou Q, Chen X, Zeng B, Wu S, Zeng H J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 4(1):63-73.

PMID: 39036387 PMC: 11256521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.003.


Perspectives for the clinical application of ctDNA analysis to breast cancer drug therapy.

Yoshinami T Breast Cancer. 2024; 32(1):1-9.

PMID: 38649655 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01571-9.


Application of microfluidic technology based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering in cancer biomarker detection: A review.

Nie C, Shaw I, Chen C J Pharm Anal. 2024; 13(12):1429-1451.

PMID: 38223444 PMC: 10785256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2023.08.009.


References
1.
Kim T, Peeters M, Thomas A, Gibbs P, Hool K, Zhang J . Impact of Emergent Circulating Tumor DNA Mutation in Panitumumab-Treated Chemoresistant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24(22):5602-5609. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3377. View

2.
Bidard F, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho J . Going with the flow: from circulating tumor cells to DNA. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5(207):207ps14. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006305. View

3.
McDonald B, Contente-Cuomo T, Sammut S, Odenheimer-Bergman A, Ernst B, Perdigones N . Personalized circulating tumor DNA analysis to detect residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2019; 11(504). PMC: 7236617. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax7392. View

4.
Pezo R, Chen T, Berman H, Mulligan A, Razak A, Siu L . Impact of multi-gene mutational profiling on clinical trial outcomes in metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 168(1):159-168. PMC: 5847065. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4580-2. View

5.
Corcoran R, Chabner B . Application of Cell-free DNA Analysis to Cancer Treatment. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(18):1754-1765. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1706174. View