» Articles » PMID: 32453964

Condition Dependence of Phenotypic Integration and the Evolvability of Genitalic Traits in a Neriid Fly

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 May 27
PMID 32453964
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spectacular diversity of insect male genitalia, and their relative insensitivity to the environment, have long puzzled evolutionary biologists and taxonomists. We asked whether the unusual evolvability of male genitalia could be associated with low morphological integration of genitalic traits, by comparison with male somatic traits and female traits. We also asked whether this pattern was robust to variation in resource availability during development, which affects adult condition. To address these questions, we manipulated larval diet quality in a split-brood design and compared levels of integration of male and female genitalic and somatic traits in the neriid fly, . We found that male genitalic traits were substantially less integrated than male somatic traits, and less integrated than female genitalic traits. Female genitalic traits were also less integrated than female somatic traits, but the difference was less pronounced than in males. However, integration of male genitalic traits was negatively condition-dependent, with high-condition males exhibiting lower trait integration than low-condition males. Finally, genitalic traits exhibited lower larval diet × family interactions than somatic traits. These results could help explain the unusually high evolvability of male genitalic traits in insects.

Citing Articles

The condition-dependence of male genital size and shape.

Pennell T, Sharma M, Sutter A, Wilson D, House C, Hosken D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(3):e11180.

PMID: 38495435 PMC: 10944674. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11180.


Morphological canalization, integration, and plasticity in response to population density in : Influences of soil conditions and growth stages.

Wang S, Zhou D Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(17):11945-11959.

PMID: 34522352 PMC: 8427568. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7960.


A comparison of two methods for estimating measurement repeatability in morphometric studies.

Wylde Z, Bonduriansky R Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(2):763-770.

PMID: 33520164 PMC: 7820162. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7032.


Condition dependence of phenotypic integration and the evolvability of genitalic traits in a neriid fly.

Wylde Z, Bonduriansky R Biol Lett. 2020; 16(5):20200124.

PMID: 32453964 PMC: 7280035. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0124.

References
1.
Wagner G, Booth G, Bagheri-Chaichian H . A POPULATION GENETIC THEORY OF CANALIZATION. Evolution. 2017; 51(2):329-347. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02420.x. View

2.
Pavlicev M, Cheverud J, Wagner G . Evolution of adaptive phenotypic variation patterns by direct selection for evolvability. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 278(1713):1903-12. PMC: 3097830. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2113. View

3.
Bonduriansky R . Convergent evolution of sexual shape dimorphism in Diptera. J Morphol. 2006; 267(5):602-11. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10426. View

4.
Eberhard W, Huber B, S R, Briceno R, Salas I, Rodriguez V . ONE SIZE FITS ALL? RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SIZE AND DEGREE OF VARIATION IN GENITALIA AND OTHER BODY PARTS IN TWENTY SPECIES OF INSECTS AND SPIDERS. Evolution. 2017; 52(2):415-431. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01642.x. View

5.
Young N, Wagner G, Hallgrimsson B . Development and the evolvability of human limbs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(8):3400-5. PMC: 2840520. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911856107. View