» Articles » PMID: 32445222

Heat and Moisture Exchanger Cassettes: Results of a Quality/safety Initiative to Reduce Postoperative Mucus Plugging After Total Laryngectomy

Overview
Journal Head Neck
Date 2020 May 24
PMID 32445222
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tracheal dryness is a concern after total laryngectomy due to the potential for mucus plugs (MP). This study compared heat and moisture exchanger (HME) cassettes to external tracheal humidification (ETH) surrounding MP events.

Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study comparing outcomes before/after implementation of a patient safety initiative utilizing HME during post laryngectomy hospitalization. The number of MP events were compared with a pre-implementation control group using ETH. Patient characteristics were analyzed for correlation with MP.

Results: The rate of MP was significantly lower in the HME group than ETH (0.13 and 0.38 per 10 inpatient days, respectively, P = .02). The proportion of patients with one or more MP events was also significantly reduced in the HME group (50% ETH and 11% HME, P = .01). Method of humidification was the only significant variable associated with MP on logistic regression modeling (P = .008).

Conclusions: HMEs were superior to ETH for prevention of MP.

Citing Articles

An Exploratory Study on the Efficacy of a New Heat and Moisture Exchanger (Provox® LifeTM) for Laryngectomized Patients.

Takeda H, Shinomiya H, Fujiwara H, Furukawa T, Teshima M, Nibu K Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73279.

PMID: 39650877 PMC: 11625442. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73279.


The Benefits of Silicone Laryngectomy Tubes at the Time of Laryngectomy-A Case Series Spanning 17 Years.

Kearney A, Samad I, Belsky M, Doyle P, Damrose E Head Neck. 2024; 47(2):720-725.

PMID: 39425511 PMC: 11717960. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27967.


New Heat and Moisture Exchangers for Laryngectomized Patients in Germany: Mixed Methods Study on the Expected Effectiveness.

Ahmed A, Mewes J, Boot I, Vrijhoef H JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e36401.

PMID: 36630171 PMC: 9878367. DOI: 10.2196/36401.

References
1.
. ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Larynx-Preservation Strategies in the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer: Guideline Summary. J Oncol Pract. 2018; 2(5):258-261. PMC: 2793619. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2006.2.5.258. View

2.
Wong C, Shakir A, Farboud A, Whittet H . Active versus passive humidification for self-ventilating tracheostomy and laryngectomy patients: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol. 2015; 41(6):646-651. DOI: 10.1111/coa.12577. View

3.
Rubin B . Physiology of airway mucus clearance. Respir Care. 2002; 47(7):761-8. View

4.
Lansaat L, van den Boer C, Muller S, van der Noort V, van den Brekel M, Hilgers F . Ex vivo humidifying capacity and patient acceptability of stoma cloths in laryngectomized individuals. Head Neck. 2017; 39(5):921-931. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24708. View

5.
Rosso M, Prgomet D, Marjanovic K, Puseljic S, Kraljik N . Pathohistological changes of tracheal epithelium in laryngectomized patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 272(11):3539-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3396-5. View