Diagnostic Cytogenetic Testing Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results of Sex Chromosome Abnormalities: Report of Five Cases and Systematic Review of Evidence
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Follow-up cytogenetic analysis has been recommended for cases with positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. This study of five cases with numerical and structural sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCA) and a review of large case series of NIPS provided guidance to improve prenatal diagnosis for SCA.
Methods: Following positive NIPS results for SCA, karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and locus-specific quantitative PCR were performed on cultured amniocytes, chorionic villi cells, and stimulated lymphocytes. Review of large case series was performed to evaluate the NIPS positive rate, follow-up rate of cytogenetic analysis, positive predictive value (PPV) for major types of SCA, and relative frequencies of subtypes of major SCA.
Results: Of the five cases with positive NIPS for SCA, case 1 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X and isodicentric Y; case 2 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X confined to the placenta; cases 3 and 4 had an isochromosome of Xq, and case 5 showed a derivative chromosome 14 from a Yq/14p translocation of maternal origin. Review of literature showed that mean positive rate of NIPS for SCA was 0.61%, follow-up rate of cytogenetics analysis was 76%, and mean PPV for SCA was 48%. Mosaic patterns and structural rearrangements involving sex chromosomes were estimated in 3%-20% and 3% of SCA cases, respectively.
Conclusion: These five cases further demonstrated the necessity to pursue follow-up cytogenetic analysis to characterize mosaic patterns and structural abnormalities involving sex chromosomes and their value for prenatal genetic counseling. A workflow showing the performance of current NIPS and cytogenetic analysis for SCA was summarized. These results could facilitate an evidence-based approach to guide prenatal diagnosis of SCA.
Analysis of fetal fraction in non-invasive prenatal testing with low-depth whole genome sequencing.
Xie X, Yin W, Li F, Xuan S, Ouyang Y Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41563.
PMID: 39850426 PMC: 11755048. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41563.
Unique Challenges of NIPT for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidy.
Wilkins-Haug L, Reimers R Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 66(3):568-578.
PMID: 37650669 PMC: 10491423. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000804.
Dowlut-McElroy T, Davis S, Howell S, Gutmark-Little I, Bamba V, Prakash S Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227(6):862-870.
PMID: 35841934 PMC: 9729468. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.004.
Jing X, Liu H, Zhu Q, Liu S, Liu J, Bai T Front Genet. 2022; 12:811414.
PMID: 35154255 PMC: 8834880. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.811414.
Xie X, Tan W, Li F, Carrano E, Ramirez P, DiAdamo A Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020; 8(7):e1297.
PMID: 32383339 PMC: 7336728. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1297.