» Articles » PMID: 32375691

Is It Home Delivery or Health Facility? Community Perceptions on Place of Childbirth in Rural Northwest Tanzania Using a Qualitative Approach

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 May 8
PMID 32375691
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In low and middle-income countries, pregnancy and delivery complications may deprive women and their newborns of life or the realization of their full potential. Provision of quality obstetric emergency and childbirth care can reduce maternal and newborn deaths. Underutilization of maternal and childbirth services remains a public health concern in Tanzania. The aim of this study was to explore elements of the local social, cultural, economic, and health systems that influenced the use of health facilities for delivery in a rural setting in Northwest Tanzania.

Methods: A qualitative approach was used to explore community perceptions of issues related to low utilization of health facilities for childbirth. Between September and December 2017, 11 focus group discussions were conducted with women (n = 33), men (n = 5) and community health workers (CHWs; n = 28); key informant interviews were conducted with traditional birth attendants (TBAs; n = 2). Coding, identification, indexing, charting, and mapping of these interviews was done using NVIVO 12 after manual familiarization of the data. Data saturation was used to determine when no further interviews or discussions were required.

Results: Four themes emerge; self-perceived obstetric risk, socio-cultural issues, economic concerns and health facility related factors. Health facility delivery was perceived to be crucial for complicated labor. However, the idea that childbirth was a "normal" process and lack of social and cultural acceptability of facility services, made home delivery appealing to many women and their families. In addition, out of pocket payments for suboptimal quality of health care was reported to hinder facility delivery.

Conclusion: Home delivery persists in rural settings due to economic and social issues, and the cultural meanings attached to childbirth. Accessibility to and affordability of respectful and culturally acceptable childbirth services remain challenging in this setting. Addressing barriers on both the demand and supply side could result in improved maternal and child outcomes during labor and delivery.

Citing Articles

Barriers and facilitators to maternal healthcare in East Africa: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of perspectives from women, their families, healthcare providers, and key stakeholders.

Teshale M, Bante A, Gedefaw Belete A, Crutzen R, Spigt M, Stutterheim S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):111.

PMID: 39901111 PMC: 11792318. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07225-8.


Does living in major towns favor institutional delivery in Somalia?.

Sheikh N, Hussein A, Mohamed S, Gele A Front Glob Womens Health. 2024; 5:1216290.

PMID: 39119357 PMC: 11306125. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1216290.


Barriers to equitable healthcare services for under-five children in Ethiopia: a qualitative exploratory study.

Fekadu H, Mekonnen W, Adugna A, Kloos H, Hailemariam D BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):613.

PMID: 38730298 PMC: 11084004. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11074-0.


Factors related to intrapartum/delivery care in Southeast Asia: A cross-sectional study in the Philippines and Indonesia.

Wulandari R, Laksono A, Rohmah N, Matahari R, Antonio C Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e27718.

PMID: 38500999 PMC: 10945253. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27718.


Factors Associated with the Place of Delivery among Urban Poor Societies in Indonesia.

Ipa M, Laksono A, Aggraeni Y, Rohmah N Indian J Community Med. 2024; 48(6):888-893.

PMID: 38249692 PMC: 10795872. DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_798_22.


References
1.
Bohren M, Hunter E, Munthe-Kaas H, Souza J, Vogel J, Gulmezoglu A . Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014; 11(1):71. PMC: 4247708. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71. View

2.
Kabakyenga J, Ostergren P, Turyakira E, Pettersson K . Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness practices among women in rural Uganda. Reprod Health. 2011; 8:33. PMC: 3231972. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-8-33. View

3.
Mgawadere F, Unkels R, Kazembe A, van den Broek N . Factors associated with maternal mortality in Malawi: application of the three delays model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):219. PMC: 5506640. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1406-5. View

4.
Dalinjong P, Wang A, Homer C . Has the free maternal health policy eliminated out of pocket payments for maternal health services? Views of women, health providers and insurance managers in Northern Ghana. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0184830. PMC: 5794072. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184830. View

5.
Titaley C, Hunter C, Dibley M, Heywood P . Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery?: a qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010; 10:43. PMC: 2928756. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-43. View