» Articles » PMID: 32364503

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-based Fractional Flow Reserve by Patient and Lesion Characteristics

Abstract

Background: A large, prospective, multicentre trial recently showed that fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary angiography (FFRangio) has an accuracy of 92% compared with conventional guidewire-based FFR (FFRwire); however, little is known about whether specific patient/lesion characteristics affect the diagnostic performance.

Aims: The primary goal of the present study was to investigate whether specific patient or lesion characteristics such as high body mass index (BMI), presentation with an acute coronary syndrome, or lesion location affect the diagnostic performance of FFRangio in patients enrolled in the FAST-FFR study.

Methods: FFRangio was measured in a blinded fashion in 301 patients (319 vessels) who were undergoing FFRwire assessment. Using an FFRwire ≤0.80 as a reference, the diagnostic performance of FFRangio was compared in pre-specified subgroups.

Results: The mean FFRwire and FFRangio were 0.81±0.13 and 0.80±0.12. Overall, FFRangio had a sensitivity of 93.5% and specificity of 91.2% for predicting FFRwire. Patient characteristics including age, sex, clinical presentation, body mass index, and diabetes did not affect sensitivity or specificity (p>0.05 for all). Similarly, lesion characteristics including calcification and tortuosity did not affect sensitivity or specificity (p>0.05 for all), nor did lesion location (proximal, middle, versus distal). Sensitivity was equally high across all target vessels, while specificity was highest in the LAD and lower (~85%) in the RCA and LCx (p<0.05).

Conclusions: FFRangio derived from coronary angiography has a high diagnostic performance regardless of patient and most lesion characteristics. The interaction of vessel on the specificity will need to be confirmed in larger cohorts.

Citing Articles

Coronary angiography: a review of the state of the art and the evolution of angiography in cardio therapeutics.

Gurav A, Revaiah P, Tsai T, Miyashita K, Tobe A, Oshima A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1468888.

PMID: 39654943 PMC: 11625592. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1468888.


Impact of calcification on Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio for physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses.

Zuo W, Sun R, Xu Y, Ji Z, Zhang R, Zhang X Cardiol J. 2023; 31(2):205-214.

PMID: 37401417 PMC: 11076030. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2023.0045.


Current status and future perspectives of fractional flow reserve derived from invasive coronary angiography.

Dobric M, Furtula M, Tesic M, Timcic S, Borzanovic D, Lazarevic N Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1181803.

PMID: 37346287 PMC: 10279845. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1181803.


The diagnostic performance of AccuFFRangio for evaluating coronary artery stenosis under different computational conditions.

Wang W, Hu Y, Xiang P, Sheng X, Leng X, Yang X Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(4):2496-2506.

PMID: 37064384 PMC: 10102786. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-893.


Coronary functional assessment in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Present situation and future direction.

Zhai C, Fan H, Zhu Y, Chen Y, Shen L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:934279.

PMID: 36082113 PMC: 9445206. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.934279.


References
1.
Adjedj J, De Bruyne B, Flore V, Di Gioia G, Ferrara A, Pellicano M . Significance of Intermediate Values of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2016; 133(5):502-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018747. View

2.
Pellicano M, Lavi I, De Bruyne B, Vaknin-Assa H, Assali A, Valtzer O . Validation Study of Image-Based Fractional Flow Reserve During Coronary Angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(9). DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.005259. View

3.
Petraco R, Sen S, Nijjer S, Echavarria-Pinto M, Escaned J, Francis D . Fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization: practical implications of a diagnostic gray zone and measurement variability on clinical decisions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6(3):222-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.014. View

4.
Escaned J, Echavarria-Pinto M, Garcia-Garcia H, van de Hoef T, de Vries T, Kaul P . Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio to Assess Coronary Stenosis Relevance: Results of ADVISE II International, Multicenter Study (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(6):824-833. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.029. View

5.
Kobayashi Y, Fearon W . Simultaneous Anatomic and Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease With Coronary Angiography Alone: Seeing the Future. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12(3):271-273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.032. View