» Articles » PMID: 32357903

Peer Support for People with Severe Mental Illness Versus Usual Care in High-, Middle- and Low-income Countries: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic, Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial (UPSIDES-RCT)

Abstract

Background: Peer support is an established intervention involving a person recovering from mental illness supporting others with mental illness. Peer support is an under-used resource in global mental health. Building upon comprehensive formative research, this study will rigorously evaluate the impact of peer support at multiple levels, including service user outcomes (psychosocial and clinical), peer support worker outcomes (work role and empowerment), service outcomes (cost-effectiveness and return on investment), and implementation outcomes (adoption, sustainability and organisational change).

Methods: UPSIDES-RCT is a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of using peer support in developing empowering mental health services (UPSIDES) at four measurement points over 1 year (baseline, 4-, 8- and 12-month follow-up), with embedded process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Research will take place in a range of high-, middle- and low-income countries (Germany, UK, Israel, India, Uganda and Tanzania). The primary outcome is social inclusion of service users with severe mental illness (N = 558; N = 93 per site) at 8-month follow-up, measured with the Social Inclusion Scale. Secondary outcomes include empowerment (using the Empowerment Scale), hope (using the HOPE scale), recovery (using Stages of Recovery) and health and social functioning (using the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales). Mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate mediators and moderators of effect and the implementation experiences of four UPSIDES stakeholder groups (service users, peer support workers, mental health workers and policy makers). A cost-effectiveness analysis examining cost-utility and health budget impact will estimate the value for money of UPSIDES peer support.

Discussion: The UPSIDES-RCT will explore the essential components necessary to create a peer support model in mental health care, while providing the evidence required to sustain and eventually scale-up the intervention in different cultural, organisational and resource settings. By actively involving and empowering service users, UPSIDES will move mental health systems toward a recovery orientation, emphasising user-centredness, community participation and the realisation of mental health as a human right.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN26008944. Registered on 30 October 2019.

Citing Articles

Attitudes of Peer Support Workers towards the Medical Model: A Qualitative Study from the Viewpoints of Peer Support Workers and Mental Health Staff.

Ruiz-Perez G, von Peter S Community Ment Health J. 2025; .

PMID: 39946029 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01454-z.


Facing the paradox of professionalizing peer roles in MH services: how addressing self-disclosure with self-determination theory might help.

Moran G Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2025; 34():e1.

PMID: 39801361 PMC: 11735117. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000751.


Measuring fidelity to manualised peer support for people with severe mental health conditions: development and psychometric evaluation of the UPSIDES fidelity scale.

Hiltensperger R, Kotera Y, Wolf P, Nixdorf R, Charles A, Farkas M BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):675.

PMID: 39394564 PMC: 11468091. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06081-8.


SUCCEED Africa: protocol for a multi-method pilot study of a community-based intervention for people with psychosis in Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Zimbabwe and Malawi.

Greenley R, Tamambang R, Koroma A, Fasoranti B, Munetsi E, Chinoko H Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024; 10(1):114.

PMID: 39192304 PMC: 11348716. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01536-x.


The role of peer support in recovery among clients with mental illness attending the psychiatric service in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia: a qualitative study.

Sulaiman I, Abdul Taib N, Lim J, Mohd Daud T, Midin M BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):470.

PMID: 38926661 PMC: 11210002. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05901-1.


References
1.
Curry L, Nembhard I, Bradley E . Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation. 2009; 119(10):1442-52. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775. View

2.
Baumgartner J, Burns J . Measuring social inclusion--a key outcome in global mental health. Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 43(2):354-64. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt224. View

3.
Vandewalle J, Debyser B, Beeckman D, Vandecasteele T, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S . Peer workers' perceptions and experiences of barriers to implementation of peer worker roles in mental health services: A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016; 60:234-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.018. View

4.
Willan A . Statistical analysis of cost-effectiveness data from randomized clinical trials. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010; 6(3):337-46. DOI: 10.1586/14737167.6.3.337. View

5.
Snyder C, Harris C, ANDERSON J, Holleran S, Irving L, Sigmon S . The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 60(4):570-85. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.570. View