Perspectives and Experiences of Stakeholders on Self-Disclosure of Peers in Mental Health Services

Overview

Journal Community Ment Health J

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 May 10

PMID 38730076

Authors

Inbar Adler Ben-Dor

Eran Kraus

Yael Goldfarb

Alina Grayzman

Bernd Puschner

Galia S Moran

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

With the movement towards recovery-oriented mental health (MH) services, individuals with MH lived-experience are increasingly employed as peer providers (peers). Peers are unique in that they bring knowledge from experience and eye-level connection to service users that enhance the quality of services and humanize MH systems' culture. In Israel, hundreds of peers are employed in various roles and settings across the MH system. However, peer integration into MH services faces challenges. One issue involves the use of self-disclosure (SD) in MH services which varies with explicitness across roles and settings. This study sought to understand perspectives and experiences regarding peers' SD (use & sharing of knowledge from experience) among different stakeholders in MH health services. Six focus groups and 4 semi-structured interviews (N = 42) were conducted as a part of a larger international project (UPSIDES; ERC Horizon 2020, Moran et al., Trials 21:371, 2020). Data was transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Four categories and 7 themes were identified regarding current perspectives and experiences with peers' SD in MH organizations: (i) Restrained or cautious organizational approach to SD; (ii) Attitudes of peers to SD approach; (iii) The influence of designated peer roles on SD; and (iv) Unwarranted SD of peers working in traditional roles. The findings reveal that peers' SD in MH services is a complex process. Organizational approaches were often controlling of non-designated peers' SD practices; participants had diverse attitudes for and against peers' SD; SD occurred according to personal preferences, specific peer role and the director's approach to peers' SD; Conflictual SD dilemmas emerged in relation to service users and staff. SD sometimes occurs unwarrantely due to ill mental health. The presence of peer-designated roles positively impacts peers' SD. We interpret the current mix of views and general conduct of peer SD practice in statutory MH services as related to three aspects: 1. The presence of a traditional therapeutic SD model vs. a peer SD model - with the former currently being dominant. 2. Insufficient proficiency and skill development in peers' SD. 3. Stigmatic notions about peer SD among service users and staff. Together, these aspects interrelate and sometimes create a negative cycle create tension and confusion.A need to develop professionalism of peer SD in statutory services is highlighted alongside enhancing staff and service user acknowledgement of the value of peer SD. Developing peer-designated roles can positively impacts peer SD in MH statutory services. Training, support, and organizational interventions are required to further support for peer-oriented SD and the enhancement of a person-centered and recovery orientation of MH services.

Citing Articles

Facing the paradox of professionalizing peer roles in MH services: how addressing self-disclosure with self-determination theory might help.

Moran G Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2025; 34():e1.

PMID: 39801361 PMC: 11735117. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000751.

References

Repper J, Carter T . A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2011; 20(4):392-411. DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2011.583947. View

Hudson E, Arnaert A, Lavoie-Tremblay M . Healthcare professional disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: a rapid scoping review. J Ment Health. 2021; 34(1):78-90. DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1979485. View

Byrne L, Roennfeldt H, Wolf J, Linfoot A, Foglesong D, Davidson L . Effective Peer Employment Within Multidisciplinary Organizations: Model for Best Practice. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021; 49(2):283-297. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-021-01162-2. View

Ibrahim N, Thompson D, Nixdorf R, Kalha J, Mpango R, Moran G . A systematic review of influences on implementation of peer support work for adults with mental health problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019; 55(3):285-293. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-019-01739-1. View

Kemp V, Henderson A . Challenges faced by mental health peer support workers: peer support from the peer supporter's point of view. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2012; 35(4):337-40. DOI: 10.2975/35.4.2012.337.340. View

Boyd J, Zeiss A, Reddy S, Skinner S . Accomplishments of 77 VA mental health professionals with a lived experience of mental illness. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2016; 86(6):610-619. DOI: 10.1037/ort0000208. View

Cook J, Jonikas J, Burke-Miller J, Hamilton M, Powell I, Tucker S . Whole Health Action Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Peer-Led Health Promotion Intervention. Psychiatr Serv. 2020; 71(10):1039-1046. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000012. View

Solomon P . Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004; 27(4):392-401. DOI: 10.2975/27.2004.392.401. View

Truong C, Gallo J, Roter D, Joo J . The role of self-disclosure by peer mentors: Using personal narratives in depression care. Patient Educ Couns. 2019; 102(7):1273-1279. PMC: 6546521. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.006. View

10.

Chinman M, Shoai R, Cohen A . Using organizational change strategies to guide peer support technician implementation in the Veterans Administration. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010; 33(4):269-77. PMC: 5644288. DOI: 10.2975/33.4.2010.269.277. View

11.

Cook J, Steigman P, Pickett S, Diehl S, Fox A, Shipley P . Randomized controlled trial of peer-led recovery education using Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support (BRIDGES). Schizophr Res. 2011; 136(1-3):36-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.016. View

12.

Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L . Peer support: a theoretical perspective. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2002; 25(2):134-41. DOI: 10.1037/h0095032. View

13.

Salzer M, Shear S . Identifying consumer-provider benefits in evaluations of consumer-delivered services. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2002; 25(3):281-8. DOI: 10.1037/h0095014. View

14.

Moran G . The mental health consumer movement and peer providers in Israel. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018; 27(5):420-426. PMC: 6999017. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796018000173. View

15.

Corrigan P, Rao D . On the self-stigma of mental illness: stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Can J Psychiatry. 2012; 57(8):464-9. PMC: 3610943. DOI: 10.1177/070674371205700804. View

16.

Hornik-Lurie T, Shalev A, Haknazar L, Garber Epstein P, Ziedenberg-Rehav L, Moran G . Implementing recovery-oriented interventions with staff in a psychiatric hospital: A mixed-methods study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018; 25(9-10):569-581. DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12502. View

17.

Mancini M . An Exploration of Factors that Effect the Implementation of Peer Support Services in Community Mental Health Settings. Community Ment Health J. 2017; 54(2):127-137. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0145-4. View

18.

Harris J, Leskela J, Hoffman-Konn L . Provider lived experience and stigma. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2016; 86(6):604-609. DOI: 10.1037/ort0000179. View

19.

Kivisto M, Martin M, Hautala S, Soronen K . Facilitators and Challenges of Integrating Experts by Experience Activity in Mental Health Services: Experiences from Finland. Community Ment Health J. 2022; 59(3):540-551. PMC: 9981489. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-01039-0. View

20.

Mutschler C, Bellamy C, Davidson L, Lichtenstein S, Kidd S . Implementation of peer support in mental health services: A systematic review of the literature. Psychol Serv. 2021; 19(2):360-374. DOI: 10.1037/ser0000531. View