» Articles » PMID: 32342344

Sensation Weighting in Duration Discrimination: A Univariate, Multivariate, and Varied-design Study of Presentation-order Effects

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2020 Apr 29
PMID 32342344
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stimulus discriminability is often assessed by comparisons of two successive stimuli: a fixed standard (St) and a varied comparison stimulus (Co). Hellström's sensation weighting (SW) model describes the subjective difference between St and Co as a difference between two weighted compounds, each comprising a stimulus and its internal reference level (ReL). The presentation order of St and Co has two important effects: Relative overestimation of one stimulus is caused by perceptual time-order errors (TOEs), as well as by judgment biases. Also, sensitivity to changes in Co tends to differ between orders StCo and CoSt: the Type B effect. In three duration discrimination experiments, difference limens (DLs) were estimated by an adaptive staircase method. The SW model was adapted for modeling of DLs generated with this method. In Experiments 1 and 2, St durations were 100, 215, 464, and 1,000 ms in separate blocks. TOEs and Type B effects were assessed with univariate and multivariate analyses, and were well accounted for by the SW model, suggesting that the two effects are closely related, as this model predicts. With short St durations, lower DLs were found with the order CoSt than with StCo, challenging alternative models. In Experiment 3, St durations of 100 and 215 ms, or 464 and 1,000 ms, were intermixed within a block. From the SW model this was predicted to shift the ReL for the first-presented interval, thereby also shifting the TOE. This prediction was confirmed, strengthening the SW model's account of the comparison of stimulus magnitudes.

Citing Articles

Order effects in stimulus discrimination challenge established models of comparative judgement: A meta-analytic review of the Type B effect.

Ellinghaus R, Bausenhart K, Koc D, Ulrich R, Liepelt R Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(5):2275-2284.

PMID: 38504004 PMC: 11543757. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02479-3.


Duration discrimination: A diffusion decision modeling approach.

Schumacher L, Voss A Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(2):560-577.

PMID: 36690915 PMC: 9935725. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02604-1.

References
1.
Ulrich R, Vorberg D . Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009; 71(6):1219-27. DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1219. View

2.
Bausenhart K, Dyjas O, Ulrich R . Effects of stimulus order on discrimination sensitivity for short and long durations. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015; 77(4):1033-43. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0875-8. View

3.
Hellstrom A . Sensation weighting in comparison and discrimination of heaviness. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000; 26(1):6-17. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.6. View

4.
Hellstrom A, Cederstrom C . Intramodal and crossmodal pairing and anchoring in comparisons of successive stimuli. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014; 76(4):1197-211. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0635-1. View

5.
Patching G, Englund M, Hellstrom A . Time- and space-order effects in timed discrimination of brightness and size of paired visual stimuli. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(4):915-40. DOI: 10.1037/a0027593. View