» Articles » PMID: 24963624

Continuous Carryover of Temporal Context Dissociates Response Bias from Perceptual Influence for Duration

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Jun 26
PMID 24963624
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent experimental evidence suggests that the perception of temporal intervals is influenced by the temporal context in which they are presented. A longstanding example is the time-order-error, wherein the perception of two intervals relative to one another is influenced by the order in which they are presented. Here, we test whether the perception of temporal intervals in an absolute judgment task is influenced by the preceding temporal context. Human subjects participated in a temporal bisection task with no anchor durations (partition method). Intervals were demarcated by a Gaussian blob (visual condition) or burst of white noise (auditory condition) that persisted for one of seven logarithmically spaced sub-second intervals. Crucially, the order in which stimuli were presented was first-order counterbalanced, allowing us to measure the carryover effect of every successive combination of intervals. The results demonstrated a number of distinct findings. First, the perception of each interval was biased by the prior response, such that each interval was judged similarly to the preceding trial. Second, the perception of each interval was also influenced by the prior interval, such that perceived duration shifted away from the preceding interval. Additionally, the effect of decision bias was larger for visual intervals, whereas auditory intervals engendered greater perceptual carryover. We quantified these effects by designing a biologically-inspired computational model that measures noisy representations of time against an adaptive memory prior while simultaneously accounting for uncertainty, consistent with a Bayesian heuristic. We found that our model could account for all of the effects observed in human data. Additionally, our model could only accommodate both carryover effects when uncertainty and memory were calculated separately, suggesting separate neural representations for each. These findings demonstrate that time is susceptible to similar carryover effects as other basic stimulus attributes, and that the brain rapidly adapts to temporal context.

Citing Articles

Mechanically Induced Motor Tremors Disrupt the Perception of Time.

Gladhill K, Kock R, Zhou W, Joiner W, Wiener M eNeuro. 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39227153 PMC: 11412164. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0013-24.2024.


The impact of task measurements on sequential dependence: a comparison between temporal reproduction and discrimination tasks.

Cheng S, Chen S, Yang X, Shi Z Psychol Res. 2024; 88(8):2346-2359.

PMID: 39190157 PMC: 11522143. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02023-x.


A novel method for estimating properties of attentional oscillators reveals an age-related decline in flexibility.

Kaya E, Kotz S, Henry M Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38904659 PMC: 11192533. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90735.


Order effects in stimulus discrimination challenge established models of comparative judgement: A meta-analytic review of the Type B effect.

Ellinghaus R, Bausenhart K, Koc D, Ulrich R, Liepelt R Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(5):2275-2284.

PMID: 38504004 PMC: 11543757. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02479-3.


A unitary mechanism underlies adaptation to both local and global environmental statistics in time perception.

Wang T, Luo Y, Ivry R, Tsay J, Poppel E, Bao Y PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(5):e1011116.

PMID: 37146089 PMC: 10191274. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011116.


References
1.
Matthews W, Stewart N . The effect of interstimulus interval on sequential effects in absolute identification. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009; 62(10):2014-29. DOI: 10.1080/17470210802649285. View

2.
Wiener M, Kliot D, Turkeltaub P, Hamilton R, Wolk D, Coslett H . Parietal influence on temporal encoding indexed by simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(35):12258-67. PMC: 3448365. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2511-12.2012. View

3.
Taatgen N, van Rijn H . Traces of times past: representations of temporal intervals in memory. Mem Cognit. 2011; 39(8):1546-60. PMC: 3205264. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0113-0. View

4.
Spencer R, Karmarkar U, Ivry R . Evaluating dedicated and intrinsic models of temporal encoding by varying context. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1525):1853-63. PMC: 2685823. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0024. View

5.
Ivry R, Schlerf J . Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008; 12(7):273-80. PMC: 4335014. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.002. View