» Articles » PMID: 32322182

Workplace Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2020 Apr 24
PMID 32322182
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Workplace interventions represent important opportunities to increase awareness of and adherence to disease prevention and health promotion initiatives. However, research on workplace interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) has not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review summarizes existing studies evaluating workplace interventions for IPV. PubMed, PsycINFO, Business Source Complete, Web of Science, and Social Services Abstracts were systematically searched for English-language studies published before November 2017. Six studies evaluating five interventions were included. Only one study used a randomized design, and only two studies measured whether outcomes were sustained over time. None of the interventions addressed perpetrators of IPV. Interventions focused on recognizing signs of abuse, responding to victims, and providing referrals to community-based resources. Methodological rigor of included studies varied, but all reported at least one intervention-related benefit. Findings included improved awareness of IPV, increased provision of information to victims, and greater willingness to intervene if an employee may be experiencing IPV. Although sparse, available evidence suggests there are potential benefits of workplace interventions for IPV. It is important for future interventions to focus on primary and secondary prevention of IPV and address perpetration, and for investigators to use rigorous study designs and measure whether effects are sustained.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of the literature: Gender-based violence in the construction and natural resources industry.

Lo J, Jaswal S, Yeung M, Chattu V, Bani-Fatemi A, Howe A AIMS Public Health. 2024; 11(2):654-666.

PMID: 39027385 PMC: 11252573. DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2024033.


The protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate couple-based violence prevention education and its ability to reduce intimate partner violence during pregnancy in Southwest Ethiopia.

Agde Z, Magnus J, Assefa N, Wordofa M PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303009.

PMID: 38739581 PMC: 11090299. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303009.


Training Informal Supporters to Improve Responses to Victim-Survivors of Domestic Violence and Abuse: A Systematic Review.

Schucan Bird K, Stokes N, Rivas C, Tomlinson M, Delve M, Gordon L Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023; 25(2):1568-1584.

PMID: 37649408 PMC: 10913311. DOI: 10.1177/15248380231189191.


Corporate Responses to Intimate Partner Violence.

Branicki L, Kalfa S, Pullen A, Brammer S J Bus Ethics. 2023; :1-21.

PMID: 37359806 PMC: 10258760. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05461-6.


Health Service Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence among Military Personnel and Veterans: A Framework and Scoping Review.

Cowlishaw S, Sbisa A, Freijah I, Kartal D, Mulligan A, Notarianni M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).

PMID: 35329239 PMC: 8955703. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063551.


References
1.
Campbell J . Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002; 359(9314):1331-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8. View

2.
Samuel L, Tudor C, Weinstein M, Moss H, Glass N . Employers' Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence among a Diverse Workforce. Saf Health Work. 2012; 2(3):250-9. PMC: 3430908. DOI: 10.5491/SHAW.2011.2.3.250. View

3.
Sugg N . Intimate partner violence: prevalence, health consequences, and intervention. Med Clin North Am. 2015; 99(3):629-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.012. View

4.
Swanberg J, Ojha M, Macke C . State employment protection statutes for victims of domestic violence: public policy's response to domestic violence as an employment matter. J Interpers Violence. 2011; 27(3):587-619. DOI: 10.1177/0886260511421668. View

5.
Tolman R, Wang H . Domestic violence and women's employment: fixed effects models of three waves of women's employment study data. Am J Community Psychol. 2005; 36(1-2):147-58. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-005-6239-0. View