» Articles » PMID: 22953209

Employers' Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence Among a Diverse Workforce

Overview
Journal Saf Health Work
Date 2012 Sep 7
PMID 22953209
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant global public health concern, affecting 5.3 million US individuals annually. An estimated 1 in 3 women globally are abused by an intimate partner in their lifetime, and the effects carry over into the workplace. This article examines employers' perceptions of IPV in the workplace, targeting supervisors of Latina employees.

Methods: Fourteen employers and supervisors of small service-sector companies in Oregon were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Interpretive description was used to identify themes. These qualitative interviews preceded and helped to formulate a larger workplace intervention study.

Results: THE FOLLOWING THEMES WERE FOUND AND ARE DETAILED: (1) factors associated with recognizing IPV in the workplace, (2) effects of IPV on the work environment and (3) supervisors' responses to IPV-active vs. passive involvement. Also, supervisors' suggestions for addressing IPV in the workplace are summarized.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the need for more IPV-related resources in the workplace to be available to supervisors as well as survivors and their coworkers. The needs of supervisors and workplaces vary by site, demonstrating the need for tailored interventions, and culturally appropriate workplace interventions are needed for Latinas and other racially and ethnically diverse populations.

Citing Articles

Corporate Responses to Intimate Partner Violence.

Branicki L, Kalfa S, Pullen A, Brammer S J Bus Ethics. 2023; :1-21.

PMID: 37359806 PMC: 10258760. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05461-6.


Perception and Practice of Workplace Violence Prevention and Its Associated Factors among Employers at Healthcare Facilities in Melaka, Malaysia.

Mohamad Yazid M, Nik Husain N, Daud A, Osman Y, Mustapa N, Abdul Hadi A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 36833601 PMC: 9956971. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20042900.


Workplace interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review.

Adhia A, Gelaye B, Friedman L, Marlow L, Mercy J, Williams M J Workplace Behav Health. 2020; 34(3).

PMID: 32322182 PMC: 7176402. DOI: 10.1080/15555240.2019.1609361.


Domestic Violence in the Canadian Workplace: Are Coworkers Aware?.

MacGregor J, Wathen C, MacQuarrie B Saf Health Work. 2016; 7(3):244-50.

PMID: 27630795 PMC: 5011092. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.01.003.


Workplace Violence and Safety Issues in Long-Term Medical Care Facilities: Nurses' Perspectives.

Fasanya B, Dada E Saf Health Work. 2016; 7(2):97-101.

PMID: 27340595 PMC: 4909840. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.11.002.


References
1.
Adames S, Campbell R . Immigrant Latinas' conceptualizations of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women. 2005; 11(10):1341-64. DOI: 10.1177/1077801205280191. View

2.
Glass N, Bloom T, Perrin N, Anger W . A Computer-based Training Intervention for Work Supervisors to Respond to Intimate Partner Violence. Saf Health Work. 2012; 1(2):167-74. PMC: 3430885. DOI: 10.5491/SHAW.2010.1.2.167. View

3.
Lipsky S, Caetano R, Field C, Larkin G . The role of intimate partner violence, race, and ethnicity in help-seeking behaviors. Ethn Health. 2005; 11(1):81-100. DOI: 10.1080/13557850500391410. View

4.
Caetano R, Field C, Ramisetty-Mikler S, McGrath C . The 5-year course of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. J Interpers Violence. 2005; 20(9):1039-57. DOI: 10.1177/0886260505277783. View

5.
Staggs S, Long S, Mason G, Krishnan S, Riger S . Intimate partner violence, social support, and employment in the post-welfare reform era. J Interpers Violence. 2007; 22(3):345-67. DOI: 10.1177/0886260506295388. View