» Articles » PMID: 32316961

The Effect of Posterior Capsule Repair in Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2020 Apr 23
PMID 32316961
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prior studies have compared the posterior capsule repair group in primary total hip arthroplasty by posterior approach with the control group without posterior capsule repair suggesting that the posterior capsule repair group had better clinical outcomes. However, it is still a controversy which treatment is more helpful for hip diseases. The purpose of our article is to obtain the postoperative outcomes between the 2 procedures.

Methods: We performed a systematic search by browsing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library. There is no restriction on the date of publication. Before we submit our manuscript, we have re-searched the literatures again, including the articles which directly compared the postoperative outcomes of the 2 procedures.

Results: A total of 8 comparative studies were included in our meta-analysis. The posterior capsule repair group showed less dislocation rate, higher HHS, and even less postoperative bleeding volume. Meanwhile, there is no significant difference in ROM between 2 groups.

Conclusion: In conclusion, according to current evidences, repairing posterior capsule during primary THA may have better functional outcomes, less dislocation incidence, and less loss of blood.

Citing Articles

Consensus document on the management of wound closure in orthopaedic surgery.

Sanz-Ruiz P, Caeiro-Rey J, Martinez-Pastor J, Martin-Alguacil J, Murcia-Asensio A, Moreta J EFORT Open Rev. 2025; 10(2):82-94.

PMID: 40071985 PMC: 11825138. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0002.


Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of risk factors and preventive options.

Regis D, Cason M, Magnan B World J Orthop. 2024; 15(6):501-511.

PMID: 38947255 PMC: 11212535. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.501.


Instantaneous Generation of Subject-Specific Finite Element Models of the Hip Capsule.

Anantha-Krishnan A, Myers C, Fitzpatrick C, Clary C Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38247914 PMC: 10813259. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010037.


Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Supra R, Supra R, Agrawal D J Orthop Sports Med. 2023; 5(2):232-240.

PMID: 37388321 PMC: 10310317. DOI: 10.26502/josm.511500106.


Using mesh in capsule anatomical reconstruction to enhance the stability of high-dislocation-risk hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Xin P, Ni M, Ji Q, Yang X, Geng L, Wang Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):102.

PMID: 36788575 PMC: 9926545. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03575-1.


References
1.
Kao J, Woolson S . Piriformis tendon repair failure after total hip replacement. Orthop Rev. 1992; 21(2):171-4. View

2.
Vicar A, Coleman C . A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (188):152-9. View

3.
Berry D, Harmsen W, Cabanela M, Morrey B . Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(2):171-7. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00002. View

4.
Cornfield J . A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data; applications to cancer of the lung, breast, and cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1951; 11(6):1269-75. View

5.
Huo M, Stockton K, Mont M, Parvizi J . What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(18):2959-72. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00851. View