» Articles » PMID: 32304758

Strategies for Identifying Dynamic Regions in Protein Complexes: Flexibility Changes Accompany Methylation in Chemotaxis Receptor Signaling States

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Apr 19
PMID 32304758
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bacterial chemoreceptors are organized in arrays composed of helical receptors arranged as trimers of dimers, coupled to a histidine kinase CheA and a coupling protein CheW. Ligand binding to the external domain inhibits the kinase activity, leading to a change in the swimming behavior. Adaptation to an ongoing stimulus involves reversible methylation and demethylation of specific glutamate residues. However, the exact mechanism of signal propagation through the helical receptor to the histidine kinase remains elusive. Dynamics of the receptor cytoplasmic domain is thought to play an important role in the signal transduction, and current models propose inverse dynamic changes in different regions of the receptor. We hypothesize that the adaptational modification (methylation) controls the dynamics by stabilizing a partially ordered domain, which in turn modulates the binding of the kinase, CheA. We investigated the difference in dynamics between the methylated and unmethylated states of the chemoreceptor using solid-state NMR. The unmethylated receptor (CF4E) shows increased flexibility relative to the methylated mimic (CF4Q). Methylation helix 1 (MH1) has been shown to be flexible in the methylated mimic receptor. Our analysis indicates that in addition to MH1, methylation helix 2 also becomes flexible in the unmethylated receptor. In addition, we have demonstrated that both states of the receptor have a rigid region and segments with intermediate timescale dynamics. The strategies used in this study for identifying dynamic regions are applicable to a broad class of proteins and protein complexes with intrinsic disorder and dynamics spanning multiple timescales.

Citing Articles

The structural logic of dynamic signaling in the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor.

Reyes G, Flack C, Parkinson J Protein Sci. 2024; 33(12):e5209.

PMID: 39555666 PMC: 11571029. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5209.


The Structural Logic of Dynamic Signaling in the Serine Chemoreceptor.

Reyes G, Flack C, Parkinson J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39091725 PMC: 11291126. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.23.604838.


Structural signatures of chemoreceptor signaling states revealed by cellular crosslinking.

Flack C, Parkinson J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(28):e2204161119.

PMID: 35787052 PMC: 9282233. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2204161119.


Concerted Differential Changes of Helical Dynamics and Packing upon Ligand Occupancy in a Bacterial Chemoreceptor.

Gordon J, Hoffman M, Troiano J, Li M, Hazelbauer G, Schlau-Cohen G ACS Chem Biol. 2021; 16(11):2472-2480.

PMID: 34647725 PMC: 9990816. DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.1c00576.

References
1.
Hu F, Luo W, Hong M . Mechanisms of proton conduction and gating in influenza M2 proton channels from solid-state NMR. Science. 2010; 330(6003):505-8. PMC: 4102303. DOI: 10.1126/science.1191714. View

2.
Zhou Q, Ames P, Parkinson J . Mutational analyses of HAMP helices suggest a dynamic bundle model of input-output signalling in chemoreceptors. Mol Microbiol. 2009; 73(5):801-14. PMC: 2749569. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06819.x. View

3.
Lamley J, Oster C, Stevens R, Lewandowski J . Intermolecular Interactions and Protein Dynamics by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015; 54(51):15374-8. PMC: 4736466. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201509168. View

4.
Samanta D, Borbat P, Dzikovski B, Freed J, Crane B . Bacterial chemoreceptor dynamics correlate with activity state and are coupled over long distances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(8):2455-60. PMC: 4345563. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414155112. View

5.
Kashefi M, Malik N, Struppe J, Thompson L . Carbon-nitrogen REDOR to identify ms-timescale mobility in proteins. J Magn Reson. 2019; 305:5-15. PMC: 6656615. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.05.008. View