» Articles » PMID: 32290337

Ageing of Dental Composites Based on Methacrylate Resins-A Critical Review of the Causes and Method of Assessment

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Apr 16
PMID 32290337
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The paper reviews the environmental factors affecting ageing processes, and the degradation of resins, filler, and the filler-matrix interface. It discusses the current methods of testing materials in vitro. A review of literature was conducted with the main sources being PubMed. ScienceDirect, Mendeley, and Google Scholar were used as other resources. Studies were selected based on relevance, with a preference given to recent research. The ageing process is an inherent element of the use of resin composites in the oral environment, which is very complex and changes dynamically. The hydrolysis of dental resins is accelerated by some substances (enzymes, acids). Bonds formed between coupling agent and inorganic filler are prone to hydrolysis. Methods for prediction of long-term behaviour are not included in composite standards. Given the very complex chemical composition of the oral environment, ageing tests based on water can only provide a limited view of the clinical performance of biomaterial. Systems that can reproduce dynamic changes in stress (thermal cycling, fatigue tests) are better able to mimic clinical conditions and could be extremely valuable in predicting dental composite clinical performance. It is essential to identify procedure to determine the ageing process of dental materials.

Citing Articles

Biofilm Formation on Three High-Performance Polymeric CAD/CAM Composites: An In Vitro Study.

Almuhayya S, Alshahrani R, Alsania R, Albassam A, Alnemari H, Babaier R Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40076168 PMC: 11902371. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050676.


A comparative in vitro study on monomer release from flash-free or conventional bonding systems.

Telatar B, Telatar G Clin Oral Investig. 2025; 29(3):169.

PMID: 40045074 PMC: 11882616. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-025-06250-3.


Towards the Standardization of Artificial Aging Protocols for Dental Composites: Evaluation of Proposed Methods.

Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Kopacz K, Ranoszek-Soliwoda K, Sokolowski J, Bociong K J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 39997583 PMC: 11856418. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16020049.


Assessment of bond strength and bioactivity on a prototype resin-based luting agent containing a novel bioactive monomer.

Iwasaki T, Kubochi K, Takata H, Komine F Odontology. 2025; .

PMID: 39907940 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-025-01053-0.


Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Conventional and Bulk-Fill Resin Composite with S-PRG Fillers After Coffee Exposure: An in-vitro Study.

Janisch F, Falcon Aguilar M, Aguiar F, Franca F, Basting R, Vieira-Junior W Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025; 17():21-29.

PMID: 39802460 PMC: 11725284. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S496750.


References
1.
Wilder Jr A, May Jr K, Bayne S, Taylor D, Leinfelder K . Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent. 2000; 11(3):135-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00390.x. View

2.
Delaviz Y, Finer Y, Santerre J . Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges. Dent Mater. 2013; 30(1):16-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.201. View

3.
Shah M, Ferracane J, Kruzic J . Mechanistic aspects of fatigue crack growth behavior in resin based dental restorative composites. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(7):909-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.097. View

4.
Bourbia M, Finer Y . Biochemical Stability and Interactions of Dental Resin Composites and Adhesives with Host and Bacteria in the Oral Cavity: A Review. J Can Dent Assoc. 2018; 84:i1. View

5.
Sm M, R S, K K, M S, F B, R A . Chemical Stability of Bioglass in Simulated Oral Environment. J Dent Biomater. 2017; 3(3):261-268. PMC: 5608061. View