» Articles » PMID: 32273536

Poor Early Cortical Differentiation of Speech Predicts Perceptual Difficulties of Severely Hearing-impaired Listeners in Multi-talker Environments

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Apr 11
PMID 32273536
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hearing impairment disrupts processes of selective attention that help listeners attend to one sound source over competing sounds in the environment. Hearing prostheses (hearing aids and cochlear implants, CIs), do not fully remedy these issues. In normal hearing, mechanisms of selective attention arise through the facilitation and suppression of neural activity that represents sound sources. However, it is unclear how hearing impairment affects these neural processes, which is key to understanding why listening difficulty remains. Here, severely-impaired listeners treated with a CI, and age-matched normal-hearing controls, attended to one of two identical but spatially separated talkers while multichannel EEG was recorded. Whereas neural representations of attended and ignored speech were differentiated at early (~ 150 ms) cortical processing stages in controls, differentiation of talker representations only occurred later (~250 ms) in CI users. CI users, but not controls, also showed evidence for spatial suppression of the ignored talker through lateralized alpha (7-14 Hz) oscillations. However, CI users' perceptual performance was only predicted by early-stage talker differentiation. We conclude that multi-talker listening difficulty remains for impaired listeners due to deficits in early-stage separation of cortical speech representations, despite neural evidence that they use spatial information to guide selective attention.

Citing Articles

Resilience and vulnerability of neural speech tracking after hearing restoration.

Federici A, Fantoni M, Pavani F, Handjaras G, Bednaya E, Martinelli A Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):343.

PMID: 40025189 PMC: 11873316. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07788-4.


Cochlear implantation in adults with acquired single-sided deafness improves cortical processing and comprehension of speech presented to the non-implanted ears: a longitudinal EEG study.

Chen Y, Neff P, Leske S, Wong D, Peter N, Obleser J Brain Commun. 2025; 7(1):fcaf001.

PMID: 39816191 PMC: 11733687. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf001.


Can Music Enhance Working Memory and Speech in Noise Perception in Cochlear Implant Users? Design Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study.

Mertel K, Dimitrijevic A, Thaut M Audiol Res. 2024; 14(4):611-624.

PMID: 39051196 PMC: 11270222. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14040052.


Effects and prediction of cognitive load on encoding model of brain response to auditory and linguistic stimuli in educational multimedia.

Asaadi A, Amiri S, Bosaghzadeh A, Ebrahimpour R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9133.

PMID: 38644370 PMC: 11033259. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59411-x.


Spectral Grouping of Electrically Encoded Sound Predicts Speech-in-Noise Performance in Cochlear Implantees.

Choi I, Gander P, Berger J, Woo J, Choy M, Hong J J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2023; 24(6):607-617.

PMID: 38062284 PMC: 10752853. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-023-00918-x.


References
1.
Bonacci L, Bressler S, Shinn-Cunningham B . Nonspatial Features Reduce the Reliance on Sustained Spatial Auditory Attention. Ear Hear. 2020; 41(6):1635-1647. PMC: 9831360. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000879. View

2.
Deng Y, Choi I, Shinn-Cunningham B . Topographic specificity of alpha power during auditory spatial attention. Neuroimage. 2019; 207:116360. PMC: 9883080. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116360. View

3.
Puvvada K, Simon J . Cortical Representations of Speech in a Multitalker Auditory Scene. J Neurosci. 2017; 37(38):9189-9196. PMC: 5607465. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0938-17.2017. View

4.
Crosse M, Di Liberto G, Bednar A, Lalor E . The Multivariate Temporal Response Function (mTRF) Toolbox: A MATLAB Toolbox for Relating Neural Signals to Continuous Stimuli. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:604. PMC: 5127806. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00604. View

5.
Fiedler L, Wostmann M, Herbst S, Obleser J . Late cortical tracking of ignored speech facilitates neural selectivity in acoustically challenging conditions. Neuroimage. 2018; 186:33-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.057. View