» Articles » PMID: 34184964

Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2021 Jun 29
PMID 34184964
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hearing loss is often asymmetric such that hearing thresholds differ substantially between the two ears. The extreme case of such asymmetric hearing is single-sided deafness. A unilateral cochlear implant (CI) on the more severely impaired ear is an effective treatment to restore hearing. The interactive effects of unilateral acoustic degradation and spatial attention to one sound source in multitalker situations are at present unclear. Here, we simulated some features of listening with a unilateral CI in young, normal-hearing listeners (=22) who were presented with 8-band noise-vocoded speech to one ear and intact speech to the other ear. Neural responses were recorded in the electroencephalogram to obtain the spectrotemporal response function to speech. Listeners made more mistakes when answering questions about vocoded (vs. intact) attended speech. At the neural level, we asked how unilateral acoustic degradation would impact the attention-induced amplification of tracking target versus distracting speech. Interestingly, unilateral degradation did not per se reduce the attention-induced amplification but instead delayed it in time: Speech encoding accuracy, modelled on the basis of the spectrotemporal response function, was significantly enhanced for attended versus ignored intact speech at earlier neural response latencies (<∼250 ms). This attentional enhancement was not absent but delayed for vocoded speech. These findings suggest that attentional selection of unilateral, degraded speech is feasible but induces delayed neural separation of competing speech, which might explain listening challenges experienced by unilateral CI users.

Citing Articles

Does Amplitude Compression Help or Hinder Attentional Neural Speech Tracking?.

Orf M, Hannemann R, Obleser J J Neurosci. 2025; 45(11).

PMID: 39843232 PMC: 11905343. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0238-24.2024.


Neural Speech Tracking Contribution of Lip Movements Predicts Behavioral Deterioration When the Speaker's Mouth Is Occluded.

Reisinger P, Gillis M, Suess N, Vanthornhout J, Haider C, Hartmann T eNeuro. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39819839 PMC: 11801124. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0368-24.2024.


Neurophysiology of Effortful Listening: Decoupling Motivational Modulation from Task Demands.

Kraus F, Ross B, Herrmann B, Obleser J J Neurosci. 2024; 44(44).

PMID: 39261007 PMC: 11529814. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0589-24.2024.


Neural attentional filters and behavioural outcome follow independent individual trajectories over the adult lifespan.

Tune S, Obleser J Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38470243 PMC: 10932541. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.92079.


Neural tracking measures of speech intelligibility: Manipulating intelligibility while keeping acoustics unchanged.

Karunathilake I, Kulasingham J, Simon J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(49):e2309166120.

PMID: 38032934 PMC: 10710032. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309166120.


References
1.
Bonacci L, Bressler S, Shinn-Cunningham B . Nonspatial Features Reduce the Reliance on Sustained Spatial Auditory Attention. Ear Hear. 2020; 41(6):1635-1647. PMC: 9831360. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000879. View

2.
Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J . FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:156869. PMC: 3021840. DOI: 10.1155/2011/156869. View

3.
Rosen S, Souza P, Ekelund C, Majeed A . Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133(4):2431-43. PMC: 3631264. DOI: 10.1121/1.4794379. View

4.
Rosen S, Faulkner A, Wilkinson L . Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 106(6):3629-36. DOI: 10.1121/1.428215. View

5.
Ma N, Morris S, Kitterick P . Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness. Ear Hear. 2016; 37(3):248-59. PMC: 4847646. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000252. View