» Articles » PMID: 32264741

Antibody CDR Loops As Ensembles in Solution Vs. Canonical Clusters from X-ray Structures

Overview
Journal MAbs
Date 2020 Apr 9
PMID 32264741
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the past decade, the relevance of antibodies as therapeutics has increased substantially. Therefore, structural and functional characterization, in particular of the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), is crucial to the design and engineering of antibodies with unique binding properties. Various studies have focused on classifying the CDR loops into a small set of main-chain conformations to facilitate antibody design by assuming that certain sequences can only adopt a limited number of conformations. Here, we present a kinetic classification of CDR loop structures as ensembles in solution. Using molecular dynamics simulations in combination with strong experimental structural information, we observe conformational transitions between canonical clusters and additional dominant solution structures in the micro-to-millisecond timescale for all CDR loops, independent of length and sequence composition. Besides identifying all relevant conformations in solution, our results revealed that various canonical cluster medians actually belong to the same kinetic minimum. Additionally, we reconstruct the kinetics and probabilities of the conformational transitions between canonical clusters, and thereby extend the model of static canonical structures to reveal a dynamic conformational ensemble in solution as a new paradigm in the field of antibody structure design. CDR: Complementary-determining region; Fv: Antibody variable fragment; PCCA: Perron cluster analysis; tICA: Time-lagged independent component analysis; V: Heavy chain variable region; V: Light chain variable region.

Citing Articles

Structural basis for antibody recognition of the proximal MUC16 ectodomain.

Lee K, Perry K, Xu M, Veillard I, Kumar R, Rao T J Ovarian Res. 2024; 17(1):41.

PMID: 38374055 PMC: 10875768. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01373-9.


Structural trends in antibody-antigen binding interfaces: a computational analysis of 1833 experimentally determined 3D structures.

Madsen A, Mejias-Gomez O, Pedersen L, Morth J, Kristensen P, Jenkins T Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:199-211.

PMID: 38161735 PMC: 10755492. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.11.056.


Phage display assisted discovery of a pH-dependent anti-α-cobratoxin antibody from a natural variable domain library.

Tulika T, Pedersen R, Rimbault C, Ahmadi S, Rivera-de-Torre E, Fernandez-Quintero M Protein Sci. 2023; 32(12):e4821.

PMID: 37897425 PMC: 10659949. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4821.


Structure and Dynamics Guiding Design of Antibody Therapeutics and Vaccines.

Fernandez-Quintero M, Pomarici N, Fischer A, Hoerschinger V, Kroell K, Riccabona J Antibodies (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37873864 PMC: 10594513. DOI: 10.3390/antib12040067.


Specific attributes of the V domain influence both the structure and structural variability of CDR-H3 through steric effects.

Guloglu B, Deane C Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1223802.

PMID: 37564639 PMC: 10410447. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223802.


References
1.
Martin A, Thornton J . Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies. J Mol Biol. 1996; 263(5):800-15. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0617. View

2.
Market E, Papavasiliou F . V(D)J recombination and the evolution of the adaptive immune system. PLoS Biol. 2003; 1(1):E16. PMC: 212695. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000016. View

3.
Shiroishi M, Yokota A, Tsumoto K, Kondo H, Nishimiya Y, Horii K . Structural evidence for entropic contribution of salt bridge formation to a protein antigen-antibody interaction: the case of hen lysozyme-HyHEL-10 Fv complex. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276(25):23042-50. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M100480200. View

4.
James L, Tawfik D . Structure and kinetics of a transient antibody binding intermediate reveal a kinetic discrimination mechanism in antigen recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(36):12730-5. PMC: 1200256. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500909102. View

5.
Roe D, Cheatham 3rd T . PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015; 9(7):3084-95. DOI: 10.1021/ct400341p. View