» Articles » PMID: 32232407

The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study-3 FFQ Has Reasonable Validity and Reproducibility for Food Groups and a Diet Quality Score

Overview
Journal J Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Apr 2
PMID 32232407
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: FFQs are commonly used to assess dietary intake and it is important to evaluate their performance in the target population.

Objective: We evaluated the reproducibility and relative validity of the Cancer Prevention Study-3 (CPS-3) FFQ in estimating usual intake of 63 food groups and diet quality in accordance with the American Cancer Society dietary guidelines for cancer prevention.

Methods: A subset of participants from the CPS-3 (433 women, 244 men), 31-70 y of age, were included in a cross-sectional diet assessment substudy (2015-2016). Reproducibility was assessed by comparing estimates from repeat FFQs, approximately 1 y apart, using Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) and Pearson correlation coefficient (rp) correlations for food groups and diet quality, respectively. Validity was assessed similarly by comparing FFQ estimates with estimates from ≤6 interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall (24HR). Analyses were stratified by sex and race/ethnicity.

Results: Reproducibility correlations for repeated FFQs were > 0.50 for 83-97% of food groups analyzed across strata of sex and race. Although participants tended to overreport plant foods (e.g., fruits and legumes) and underreport refined grains and sugar-sweetened beverages, the median energy-adjusted, deattenuated Spearman correlations comparing the second FFQ to the 24HR were 0.50 and 0.52 among men and women (range: 0.05-0.82), respectively, suggesting that ranking was preserved for most food groups. Validity was highest for coffee, alcohol, and total dairy, and lowest for pasta and regular-fat yogurt. Median validity across food groups varied by race/ethnicity and was highest among whites (rs = 0.54) followed by Hispanics (rs = 0.49) and African Americans (rs = 0.45). The diet quality score had good validity in all subgroups examined, but was higher among men (rp = 0.69) than women (rp = 0.61), and lower among whites (rp = 0.62) than Hispanics (rp = 0.64) or African Americans (rp = 0.73).

Conclusions: This study indicates good reproducibility and validity of the CPS-3 FFQ for most major food groups and the diet quality score in all sex and race/ethnicity groups examined.

Citing Articles

Relative validity of three diet quality scores derived from the Brief-type Self-administered Diet History Questionnaire and Meal-based Diet History Questionnaire in Japanese adults.

Oono F, Murakami K, Shinozaki N, Kimoto N, Masayasu S, Sasaki S Br J Nutr. 2024; 132(12):1663-1673.

PMID: 39529292 PMC: 11695110. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114524002058.


Development and Evaluation of the Reliability of a Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess the Intake in the Serbian Population.

Garcia S, Vidovic B, Tijerina A, Tur J, Bouzas C Nutrients. 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39125370 PMC: 11313923. DOI: 10.3390/nu16152490.


Validation of a digital food frequency questionnaire for the Northern Sweden Diet Database.

Wennberg M, Kastenbom L, Eriksson L, Winkvist A, Johansson I Nutr J. 2024; 23(1):83.

PMID: 39049045 PMC: 11267735. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-024-00984-8.


Validity and Reproducibility of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire for Measuring Intakes of Foods and Food Groups.

Gu X, Wang D, Sampson L, Barnett J, Rimm E, Stampfer M Am J Epidemiol. 2023; 193(1):170-179.

PMID: 37552965 PMC: 10773483. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwad170.


Development and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Evaluating the Nutritional Status of Patients with Cancer.

Lee S, Choi H, Park S, Lee H Nutrients. 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 36839367 PMC: 9962971. DOI: 10.3390/nu15041009.