» Articles » PMID: 32231429

Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 Apr 2
PMID 32231429
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Older listeners have difficulty understanding speech in unfavorable listening conditions. To compensate for acoustic degradation, cognitive processing skills, such as working memory, need to be engaged. Despite prior findings on the association between working memory and speech recognition in various listening conditions, it is not yet clear whether the modality of stimuli presentation for working memory tasks should be auditory or visual. Given the modality-specific characteristics of working memory, we hypothesized that auditory working memory capacity could predict speech recognition performance in adverse listening conditions for older listeners and that the contribution of auditory working memory to speech recognition would depend on the task and listening condition.

Methods: Seventy-six older listeners and twenty younger listeners completed four kinds of auditory working memory tasks, including digit and speech span tasks, and sentence recognition tasks in four different listening conditions having multi-talker noise and time-compression. For older listeners, cognitive function was screened using the Mini-Mental Status Examination, and audibility was assured.

Results: Auditory working memory, as measured by listening span, significantly predicted speech recognition performance in adverse listening conditions for older listeners. A linear regression model showed speech recognition performance for older listeners could be explained by auditory working memory whilst controlling for the impact of age and hearing sensitivity.

Discussion: Measuring working memory in the auditory modality facilitated explaining the variance in speech recognition in adverse listening conditions for older listeners. The linguistic features and the complexity of the auditory stimuli may affect the association between working memory and speech recognition performance.

Conclusion: We demonstrated the contribution of auditory working memory to speech recognition in unfavorable listening conditions in older populations. Taking the modality-specific characteristics of working memory into account may be a key to better understand the difficulty in speech recognition in daily listening conditions for older listeners.

Citing Articles

Immersive auditory-cognitive training improves speech-in-noise perception in older adults with varying hearing and working memory.

Frei V, Giroud N NPJ Sci Learn. 2025; 10(1):12.

PMID: 40055345 PMC: 11889142. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-025-00306-5.


Auditory sequence learning with degraded input: children with cochlear implants ('nature effect') compared to children from low and high socio-economic backgrounds ('nurture effect').

Cohen S, Perez R, Kishon-Rabin L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7872.

PMID: 40050361 PMC: 11885848. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92454-2.


Executive Function Associations With Audibility-Adjusted Speech Perception in Noise.

Eckert M, Matthews L, Vaden Jr K, Dubno J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024; 67(12):4811-4828.

PMID: 39475684 PMC: 11666980. DOI: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00333.


Study of Speech Recognition in Noise and Working Memory in Adults and Elderly with Normal Hearing.

Akashi D, Martinelli M Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 28(3):e473-e480.

PMID: 38974622 PMC: 11226241. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779432.


Prediction of pure tone thresholds using the speech reception threshold and age in elderly individuals with hearing loss.

Dindamrongkul R, Liabsuetrakul T, Pitathawatchai P BMC Res Notes. 2024; 17(1):107.

PMID: 38632663 PMC: 11025194. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-06762-3.


References
1.
Pichora-Fuller M, Kramer S, Eckert M, Edwards B, Hornsby B, Humes L . Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016; 37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312. View

2.
Rabbitt P . Channel-capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory. Q J Exp Psychol. 1968; 20(3):241-8. DOI: 10.1080/14640746808400158. View

3.
Fullgrabe C, Meyer B, Lorenzi C . Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes. Hear Res. 2003; 178(1-2):35-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00027-3. View

4.
Fullgrabe C, Rosen S . On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds. Front Psychol. 2016; 7():1268. PMC: 5003928. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01268. View

5.
Ronnberg J, Rudner M, Lunner T, Zekveld A . When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise. Noise Health. 2010; 12(49):263-9. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.70505. View