» Articles » PMID: 26136699

The Relationship of Speech Intelligibility with Hearing Sensitivity, Cognition, and Perceived Hearing Difficulties Varies for Different Speech Perception Tests

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Jul 3
PMID 26136699
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Listeners vary in their ability to understand speech in noisy environments. Hearing sensitivity, as measured by pure-tone audiometry, can only partly explain these results, and cognition has emerged as another key concept. Although cognition relates to speech perception, the exact nature of the relationship remains to be fully understood. This study investigates how different aspects of cognition, particularly working memory and attention, relate to speech intelligibility for various tests. Perceptual accuracy of speech perception represents just one aspect of functioning in a listening environment. Activity and participation limits imposed by hearing loss, in addition to the demands of a listening environment, are also important and may be better captured by self-report questionnaires. Understanding how speech perception relates to self-reported aspects of listening forms the second focus of the study. Forty-four listeners aged between 50 and 74 years with mild sensorineural hearing loss were tested on speech perception tests differing in complexity from low (phoneme discrimination in quiet), to medium (digit triplet perception in speech-shaped noise) to high (sentence perception in modulated noise); cognitive tests of attention, memory, and non-verbal intelligence quotient; and self-report questionnaires of general health-related and hearing-specific quality of life. Hearing sensitivity and cognition related to intelligibility differently depending on the speech test: neither was important for phoneme discrimination, hearing sensitivity alone was important for digit triplet perception, and hearing and cognition together played a role in sentence perception. Self-reported aspects of auditory functioning were correlated with speech intelligibility to different degrees, with digit triplets in noise showing the richest pattern. The results suggest that intelligibility tests can vary in their auditory and cognitive demands and their sensitivity to the challenges that auditory environments pose on functioning.

Citing Articles

Individual Differences in the Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Speech: Associations With Neurocognitive Functions in Adult Cochlear Implant Users and With Noise-Vocoded Simulations.

Moberly A, Du L, Tamati T Trends Hear. 2025; 29:23312165241312449.

PMID: 39819389 PMC: 11742172. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241312449.


Beyond the cochlea: exploring the multifaceted nature of hearing loss in primary mitochondrial diseases.

Koohi N, Holmes S, Male A, Bamiou D, Dudziec M, Ramdharry G Brain Commun. 2024; 6(6):fcae374.

PMID: 39584158 PMC: 11583428. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae374.


Spatial selective auditory attention is preserved in older age but is degraded by peripheral hearing loss.

Caso A, Griffiths T, Holmes E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26243.

PMID: 39482327 PMC: 11527878. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77102-5.


Brazilian Society of Otology task force - cochlear implant ‒ recommendations based on strength of evidence.

Tsuji R, Hamerschmidt R, Lavinsky J, Felix F, Silva V Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 91(1):101512.

PMID: 39442262 PMC: 11539123. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101512.


Speech-Identification During Standing as a Multitasking Challenge for Young, Middle-Aged and Older Adults.

Van Wilderode M, Van Humbeeck N, Krampe R, van Wieringen A Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241260621.

PMID: 39053897 PMC: 11282555. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241260621.


References
1.
Nabelek A, Tucker F, Letowski T . Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res. 1991; 34(3):679-85. View

2.
Henshaw H, McCormack A, Ferguson M . Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is associated with computer-based auditory training uptake, engagement, and adherence for people with hearing loss. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1067. PMC: 4526789. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01067. View

3.
Gatehouse S . Rehabilitation: identification of needs, priorities and expectations, and the evaluation of benefit. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42 Suppl 2:2S77-83. View

4.
Miyake A, Friedman N, Emerson M, Witzki A, Howerter A, Wager T . The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000; 41(1):49-100. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734. View

5.
Mayo L, Florentine M, Buus S . Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40(3):686-93. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4003.686. View