» Articles » PMID: 32231416

Current Status of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: An Opinion Review

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2020 Apr 2
PMID 32231416
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bariatric surgeries have been demonstrated to be safe and effective treatment options for morbid obesity patients, but operative risks and high health care costs limit their clinical application. Endoscopic bariatric therapies are emerging as valuable alternatives for patients with doubts about bariatric surgery or ineligible for it. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), a relatively novel technique of endoscopic bariatric therapies, has gained standing in the past few years. The safety, feasibility, repeatability, and potential for reversibility of ESG have been proven by multicenter studies. Compared to other weight loss strategies, current evidence demonstrates that ESG offers satisfactory efficacy in weight loss. Even though it is inferior to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, it has lower risks of adverse events than surgical interventions and intragastric balloon within one-year follow-up. Furthermore, ESG may be the ideal weight control strategy for patients who have poor adherence to behavioral interventions. Even so, trends in decreased weight loss effect over time, post-procedure weight regain, post-procedure gut hormone alteration, and possible effects of race and ethnicity on ESG still remain undetermined due to very limited reports and very short follow-ups. Further clinical trials are required to validate and answer these questions.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of concomitant antiobesity medication use with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in clinical US settings.

Gala K, Ghusn W, Brunaldi V, McGowan C, Sharaiha R, Maselli D Obes Pillars. 2024; 11:100112.

PMID: 38831924 PMC: 11145356. DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100112.


Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (LSG): A Comparative Review.

Nduma B, Mofor K, Tatang J, Amougou L, Nkeonye S, Chineme P Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41466.

PMID: 37426405 PMC: 10325692. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41466.


Endoscopic therapy of weight regain after bariatric surgery.

Bulajic M, di Prampero S, Boskoski I, Costamagna G World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022; 13(12):1584-1596.

PMID: 35070065 PMC: 8727177. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i12.1584.


Global trends in research related to sleeve gastrectomy: A bibliometric and visualized study.

Barqawi A, Abushamma F, Akkawi M, Al-Jabi S, Shahwan M, Jairoun A World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021; 13(11):1509-1522.

PMID: 34950437 PMC: 8649568. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1509.

References
1.
Chen C, Lee W, Asakawa A, Fujitsuka N, Chong K, Chen S . Insulin secretion and interleukin-1β dependent mechanisms in human diabetes remission after metabolic surgery. Curr Med Chem. 2013; 20(18):2374-88. DOI: 10.2174/0929867311320180008. View

2.
Lee W, Chen C, Chong K, Lee Y, Chen S, Lee S . Changes in postprandial gut hormones after metabolic surgery: a comparison of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011; 7(6):683-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.07.009. View

3.
Abu Dayyeh B, Rajan E, Gostout C . Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a potential endoscopic alternative to surgical sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of obesity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 78(3):530-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.197. View

4.
Chen Y, Inui A, Chang E, Chen S, Lee W, Chen C . Comparison of gut hormones and adipokines stimulated by glucagon test among patients with type II diabetes mellitus after metabolic surgery. Neuropeptides. 2015; 55:39-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.npep.2015.11.002. View

5.
Abu Dayyeh B, Kumar N, Edmundowicz S, Jonnalagadda S, Larsen M, Sullivan S . ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82(3):425-38.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1964. View