The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2020 Apr 1

PMID 32226685

Citations 11

Authors

Amir Goodarzi

Jared Clouse

Tatiana Capizzano

Kee D Kim

Ripul Panchal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However, it remains unclear if the potential benefits of hemilaminectomies, used in other routine spinal procedures, apply to intradural spinal tumors. This report presents a six-year single institutional analysis of open resection of intradural tumors using laminectomies as compared to hemilaminectomies. Methods A single institution, multisurgeon, retrospective review of 52 patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors over a six-year period was performed. Estimated blood loss, operative time, post-operative complications, length of stay, and post-operative clinical spinal instability were analyzed and compared between the two surgical techniques. Results The mean follow-up was 34 and 20 months for the laminectomy and hemilaminectomy groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in operative times between the two groups (hemilaminectomy: 250.13±76.44 minutes, laminectomy: 244.49±92.85 minutes; p=0.43). Similarly, there was no difference in overall estimated blood loss (hemilaminectomy: 125±74 cc, laminectomy: 256.05±320.8 cc; p=0.27) or mean hospital length of stay (hemilaminectomy: 4.00±2.12 days, laminectomy: 5.26±3.0 days; p=0.60). No patient in either surgical group had post-operative evidence of clinical spinal instability. Conclusion Hemilaminectomy is a viable approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors, with similar rates of post-operative complications to laminectomy when using an open surgical approach. The laminectomy allows for bilateral exposure of the entire spinal canal and neural foramina; and continues to be the preferred method for resection of large tumors with complex morphology.

Citing Articles

Hemilaminectomy vs. laminectomy for spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Teles de Oliveira Pineiro G, Rodrigues de Oliveira M, Ferreira Sandes P, Chaves Rocha de Souza D, de Azevedo Figueiredo Trocoli C, Souza Medrado-Nunes G Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):270.

PMID: 40014169 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03435-y.

Comparison of microscopic full-laminectomy (open surgery) and microendoscopic minimally invasive hemilaminectomy for thoracic extramedullary spinal tumours.

Chen G, Yu Y, Qian C, Jiang Y, Chen J J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):444.

PMID: 39003497 PMC: 11245853. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02969-4.

Resection of a large multisegmental filum terminale ependymoma through a multisegmental hemilaminectomy.

Bhandari P Neurosurg Focus Video. 2023; 9(2):V20.

PMID: 37854645 PMC: 10580747. DOI: 10.3171/2023.6.FOCVID2349.

A multilevel posterior tension band-sparing laminectomy for intraspinal lesions: patient series.

Barrenechea I, Marquez L, Miralles S, Rojas H, Pastore J, Vincenti P J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023; 6(14).

PMID: 37782961 PMC: 10555601. DOI: 10.3171/CASE23292.

Gao L, Ye L, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Wang X, Cheng B J Pain Res. 2023; 16:2861-2869.

PMID: 37609360 PMC: 10441654. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S409773.

References

Lee J, Jang J, Kim S, Moon H, Lee J, Kim S . Surgical results after unilateral laminectomy for the removal of spinal cord tumors. Korean J Spine. 2015; 9(3):232-8. PMC: 4431008. DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.3.232. View

YASARGIL M, Tranmer B, Adamson T, Roth P . Unilateral partial hemi-laminectomy for the removal of extra- and intramedullary tumours and AVMs. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 1991; 18:113-32. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6697-0_3. View

Raygor K, Than K, Chou D, Mummaneni P . Comparison of minimally invasive transspinous and open approaches for thoracolumbar intradural-extramedullary spinal tumors. Neurosurg Focus. 2015; 39(2):E12. DOI: 10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15187. View

JAVID M, Hadar E . Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 1998; 89(1):1-7. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0001. View

Canbay S, Hasturk A, Basmaci M, Erten F, Harman F . Management of Thoracal and Lumbar Schwannomas Using a Unilateral Approach without Instability: An Analysis of 15 Cases. Asian Spine J. 2012; 6(1):43-9. PMC: 3302914. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.1.43. View

Goncalves V, Santiago B, Ferreira V, Sa M . Minimally invasive resection of an extradural far lateral lumbar schwannoma with zygapophyseal joint sparing: surgical nuances and literature review. Case Rep Med. 2014; 2014:739862. PMC: 4189855. DOI: 10.1155/2014/739862. View

Pompili A, Caroli F, Cattani F, Crecco M, Giovannetti M, Raus L . Unilateral limited laminectomy as the approach of choice for the removal of thoracolumbar neurofibromas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(15):1698-702. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000132311.89236.c2. View

Turel M, DSouza W, Rajshekhar V . Hemilaminectomy approach for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: an analysis of 164 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2015; 39(2):E9. DOI: 10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15170. View

Xie T, Qian J, Lu Y, Chen B, Jiang Y, Luo C . Biomechanical comparison of laminectomy, hemilaminectomy and a new minimally invasive approach in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical intradural tumour: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(12):2719-30. PMC: 3843793. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2992-1. View

10.

Chiou S, Eggert H, Laborde G, Seeger W . Microsurgical unilateral approaches for spinal tumour surgery: eight years' experience in 256 primary operated patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1989; 100(3-4):127-33. DOI: 10.1007/BF01403599. View

11.

Tan T, Black P . Sir Victor Horsley (1857-1916): pioneer of neurological surgery. Neurosurgery. 2002; 50(3):607-11; discussion 611-2. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200203000-00032. View

12.

Keller T, Holland M . Some notable American spine surgeons of the 19th century. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(12):1413-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199706150-00022. View

13.

Lee S, Jahng T, Kim H . Different Surgical Approaches for Spinal Schwannoma: A Single Surgeon's Experience with 49 Consecutive Cases. World Neurosurg. 2015; 84(6):1894-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.027. View

14.

Yeo D, Im S, Park K, Shin D, Kim B, Shin W . Profiles of Spinal Cord Tumors Removed through a Unilateral Hemilaminectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011; 50(3):195-200. PMC: 3218177. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.3.195. View

15.

Gandhi R, German J . Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of intradural spinal pathology. Neurosurg Focus. 2013; 35(2):E5. DOI: 10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS13163. View

16.

Albert T, Vacarro A . Postlaminectomy kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 23(24):2738-45. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199812150-00014. View

17.

Snyder L, OToole J, Eichholz K, Perez-Cruet M, Fessler R . The technological development of minimally invasive spine surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:293582. PMC: 4055392. DOI: 10.1155/2014/293582. View

18.

Halvorsen C, Ronning P, Hald J, Johannesen T, Kolstad F, Langmoen I . The Long-term Outcome After Resection of Intraspinal Nerve Sheath Tumors: Report of 131 Consecutive Cases. Neurosurgery. 2015; 77(4):585-92. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000890. View

19.

Lu D, Chou D, Mummaneni P . A comparison of mini-open and open approaches for resection of thoracolumbar intradural spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14(6):758-64. DOI: 10.3171/2011.1.SPINE09860. View

20.

Eggert H, Scheremet R, Seeger W, Gaitzsch J . Unilateral microsurgical approaches to extramedullary spinal tumours. Operative technique and results. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1983; 67(3-4):245-53. DOI: 10.1007/BF01401426. View