» Articles » PMID: 22102948

Profiles of Spinal Cord Tumors Removed Through a Unilateral Hemilaminectomy

Overview
Date 2011 Nov 22
PMID 22102948
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To present the profiles of spinal cord tumors that can be removed through a unilateral hemilaminectomy and to demonstrate its usefulness for benign spinal cord tumors that significantly occupy the spinal canal.

Methods: From June 2004 to October 2010, 25 spinal cord tumors were approached with unilateral hemilaminectomy. We calculated the cross-sectional occupying ratio (CSOR) of tumor to spinal canal before and after the operations.

Results: The locations of the tumors were intradural extramedullary in 20 cases, extradural in 2, and intramedullary in 3. The levels of the tumors were lumbar in 12, thoracic 9, and cervical 4. In all cases, the tumor was removed grossly and totally without damaging spinal cord or roots. The mean height and width of the lesions we195re 17.64 mm (3-47.5) and 12.62 mm (4-32.7), respectively. The mean CSOR was 69.40% (range, 27.8-96.9%). Postoperative neurological status showed improvement in all patients except one whose neurologic deficit remained unchanged. Postoperative spinal stability was preserved during the follow-up period (mean, 21.5 months) in all cases. Tumor recurrence did not develop during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: Unilateral hemilaminectomy combined with microsurgical technique provides sufficient space for the removal of diverse spinal cord tumors. The basic profiles of the spinal cord tumors which can be removed through the unilateral hemilaminectomy demonstrate its role for the surgery of the benign spinal cord tumors in various sizes.

Citing Articles

Laminectomy vs Fusion for Intradural Extramedullary Tumors.

Mo K, Mazzi J, Laljani R, Ortiz-Babilonia C, Wang K, Raad M Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(2):198-204.

PMID: 36977535 PMC: 10165638. DOI: 10.14444/8430.


Hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal tumors: An analysis of 901 patients.

Liao D, Li D, Wang R, Xu J, Chen H Front Neurol. 2023; 13:1094073.

PMID: 36712439 PMC: 9874286. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1094073.


Endoscopically controlled surgery with open hemilaminectomy for the treatment of intradural extramedullary tumors: an operative technique and short-term outcomes of 20 consecutive cases.

Yan X, Wang H, Li C, Lin Y, Lin L, Zhu S Chin Neurosurg J. 2021; 7(1):1.

PMID: 33390192 PMC: 7780615. DOI: 10.1186/s41016-020-00222-0.


The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?.

Goodarzi A, Clouse J, Capizzano T, Kim K, Panchal R Cureus. 2020; 12(2):e7084.

PMID: 32226685 PMC: 7096001. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7084.


Age Is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications Following Excisional Laminectomy for Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumors.

Phan K, Vig K, Ho Y, Hussain A, Di Capua J, Kim J Global Spine J. 2019; 9(2):126-132.

PMID: 30984489 PMC: 6448195. DOI: 10.1177/2192568218754512.


References
1.
Sim J, Noh S, Song Y, Kim H . Removal of intradural-extramedullary spinal cord tumors with unilateral limited laminectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008; 43(5):232-6. PMC: 2588222. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2008.43.5.232. View

2.
Nakamura H, Komagata M, Nishiyama M, Taguchi M, Kawasaki N . Resection of a dumbbell-shaped thoracic neurinoma by hemilaminectomy: a case report. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 13(1):36-9. View

3.
Chiou S, Eggert H, Laborde G, Seeger W . Microsurgical unilateral approaches for spinal tumour surgery: eight years' experience in 256 primary operated patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1989; 100(3-4):127-33. DOI: 10.1007/BF01403599. View

4.
Inoue A, Ikata T, Katoh S . Spinal deformity following surgery for spinal cord tumors and tumorous lesions: analysis based on an assessment of the spinal functional curve. Spinal Cord. 1996; 34(9):536-42. DOI: 10.1038/sc.1996.97. View

5.
Hanci M, Bozkus H, Kaynar M, Kafadar A . Unilateral hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal space-occupying lesions. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1997; 40(2):74-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1053420. View