» Articles » PMID: 32222810

Comparison of [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [F] FDG PET/CT for the Diagnosis of Primary and Metastatic Lesions in Patients with Various Types of Cancer

Overview
Date 2020 Mar 31
PMID 32222810
Citations 203
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the potential usefulness of [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in various types of cancer, compared with [F] FDG PET/CT.

Methods: A total of 75 patients with various types of cancer underwent contemporaneous [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [F] FDG PET/CT either for an initial assessment or for recurrence detection. Tumour uptake was quantified by the maximum standard uptake value (SUV). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of [F] FDG and [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were calculated and compared to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 75 patients (47 males and 28 females; median age, 61.5 years; age range, 32-85 years). Fifty-four patients with 12 different tumour entities underwent paired [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [F] FDG PET/CT for initial assessment, while the other 21 patients underwent paired scans for recurrence detection. [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT was able to clearly identify 12 types of malignant tumours with favourable tumour-to-background contrast, which resulted in a higher detection rate of primary tumours than did [F] FDG PET/CT (98.2% vs. 82.1%, P = 0.021). Meanwhile, [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed a better sensitivity than [F] FDG PET/CT in the detection of lymph nodes (86.4% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.004) and bone and visceral metastases (83.8% vs. 59.5%, P = 0.004).

Conclusion: [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed a superior diagnostic efficacy than [F] FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of cancer, especially in identifying liver metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and brain tumours.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabelled FAPI Versus [F]FDG PET Imaging in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Henrar R, Vuijk F, Burchell G, van Dieren S, de Geus-Oei L, Kazemier G Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076605 PMC: 11900289. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051978.


Clinical comprehensive evaluation of [F]AlF-FAP-NUR PET: multi-time-point imaging, head-to-head comparison with [F]FDG.

Zhang Z, Liu S, Liang S, Bai X, He Y, Zhong J Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 40055208 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07171-9.


Insights into lung cancer diagnosis and clinical management using [F]F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-42 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

Mu X, Zhu Z, Wang Z, Li X, Wu Y, Li J Ann Nucl Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40053176 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-025-02032-9.


Comparison of Al[F]-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [F]-FDG PET/CT in a patient with lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis: a case report and literature review.

Qin J, Yu J, Wei Y Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1470132.

PMID: 39963103 PMC: 11830580. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1470132.


Current and Emerging Radiotracers and Technologies for Detection of Advanced Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Pishdad R, Santhanam P Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941793 PMC: 11816070. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030425.