Computational Model Predicts Paracrine and Intracellular Drivers of Fibroblast Phenotype After Myocardial Infarction
Overview
Molecular Biology
Authors
Affiliations
The fibroblast is a key mediator of wound healing in the heart and other organs, yet how it integrates multiple time-dependent paracrine signals to control extracellular matrix synthesis has been difficult to study in vivo. Here, we extended a computational model to simulate the dynamics of fibroblast signaling and fibrosis after myocardial infarction (MI) in response to time-dependent data for nine paracrine stimuli. This computational model was validated against dynamic collagen expression and collagen area fraction data from post-infarction rat hearts. The model predicted that while many features of the fibroblast phenotype at inflammatory or maturation phases of healing could be recapitulated by single static paracrine stimuli (interleukin-1 and angiotensin-II, respectively), mimicking the reparative phase required paired stimuli (e.g. TGFβ and endothelin-1). Virtual overexpression screens simulated with either static cytokine pairs or post-MI paracrine dynamic predicted phase-specific regulators of collagen expression. Several regulators increased (Smad3) or decreased (Smad7, protein kinase G) collagen expression specifically in the reparative phase. NADPH oxidase (NOX) overexpression sustained collagen expression from reparative to maturation phases, driven by TGFβ and endothelin positive feedback loops. Interleukin-1 overexpression had mixed effects, both enhancing collagen via the TGFβ positive feedback loop and suppressing collagen via NFκB and BAMBI (BMP and activin membrane-bound inhibitor) incoherent feed-forward loops. These model-based predictions reveal network mechanisms by which the dynamics of paracrine stimuli and interacting signaling pathways drive the progression of fibroblast phenotypes and fibrosis after myocardial infarction.
Heart Scar-In-A-Dish: Tissue Culture Platform to Study Myocardial Infarct Healing In Vitro.
Potter M, Heywood J, Coeyman S, Richardson W bioRxiv. 2025; .
PMID: 40060569 PMC: 11888419. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.28.640625.
Klak M, Rachalewski M, Filip A, Dobrzanski T, Berman A, Wszola M Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).
PMID: 38790306 PMC: 11117567. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050439.
Khalilimeybodi A, Saucerman J, Rangamani P Comput Biol Med. 2024; 175:108499.
PMID: 38677172 PMC: 11175993. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108499.
On modeling the multiscale mechanobiology of soft tissues: Challenges and progress.
Guo Y, Mofrad M, Tepole A Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 3(3):031303.
PMID: 38505274 PMC: 10903412. DOI: 10.1063/5.0085025.
Nelson A, Christiansen S, Naegle K, Saucerman J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(5):e2303513121.
PMID: 38266046 PMC: 10835125. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2303513121.