» Articles » PMID: 32197478

Influence of the Acetabular Cup Material on the Shell Deformation and Strain Distribution in the Adjacent Bone-A Finite Element Analysis

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Mar 22
PMID 32197478
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In total hip arthroplasty, excessive acetabular cup deformations and altered strain distribution in the adjacent bone are potential risk factors for implant loosening. Materials with reduced stiffness might alter the strain distribution less, whereas shell and liner deformations might increase. The purpose of our current computational study was to evaluate whether carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketones with a Young´s modulus of 15 GPa (CFR-PEEK-15) and 23 GPa (CFR-PEEK-23) might be an alternative shell material compared to titanium in terms of shell and liner deformation, as well as strain distribution in the adjacent bone. Using a finite element analysis, the press-fit implantation of modular acetabular cups with shells made of titanium, CFR-PEEK-15 and CFR-PEEK-23 in a human hemi-pelvis model was simulated. Liners made of ceramic and polyethylene were simulated. Radial shell and liner deformations as well as strain distributions were analyzed. The shells made of CFR-PEEK-15 were deformed most (266.7 µm), followed by CFR-PEEK-23 (136.5 µm) and titanium (54.0 µm). Subsequently, the ceramic liners were radially deformed by up to 4.4 µm and the polyethylene liners up to 184.7 µm. The shell materials slightly influenced the strain distribution in the adjacent bone with CFR-PEEK, resulting in less strain in critical regions (<400 µm/m or >3000 µm/m) and more strain in bone building or sustaining regions (400 to 3000 µm/m), while the liner material only had a minor impact. The superior biomechanical properties of the acetabular shells made of CFR-PEEK could not be determined in our present study.

Citing Articles

The influence of PEEK acetabular shell on the mechanical stability of total hip replacements under gait loading and motion.

Shi H, Zhang X, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Jin Z Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; .

PMID: 39680316 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03257-y.


Feasibility of a Shape-Memory-Alloy-Actuator System for Modular Acetabular Cups.

Rotsch C, Kemter-Esser K, Dohndorf J, Knothe M, Drossel W, Heyde C Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38247952 PMC: 10813518. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010075.


Finite Element Analysis of Acetabulum Prosthesis' Lining Damage Zone with Different Implanting Angle.

Bian Y, Wang H, Huang A Comput Math Methods Med. 2023; 2023:9350474.

PMID: 37304323 PMC: 10256448. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9350474.


Extended mechanical loads for the analysis of acetabular cages.

Doczi M, Szody R, Zwierczyk P Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023; 22(4):1411-1423.

PMID: 37266733 PMC: 10366256. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-023-01728-z.


Developing Patient-Specific Statistical Reconstructions of Healthy Anatomical Structures to Improve Patient Outcomes.

Wysocki M, Lewis S, Doyle S Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36829617 PMC: 9952233. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020123.


References
1.
Frost H . Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003; 275(2):1081-101. DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.10119. View

2.
Widmer K, Zurfluh B, Morscher E . Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(7):926-35. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.34526. View

3.
Carter D, Hayes W . The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; 59(7):954-62. View

4.
Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei S . Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012; 7:1215-25. PMC: 3298387. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S28101. View

5.
Scholes S, Inman I, Unsworth A, Jones E . Tribological assessment of a flexible carbon-fibre-reinforced poly(ether-ether-ketone) acetabular cup articulating against an alumina femoral head. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008; 222(3):273-83. DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM334. View