» Articles » PMID: 32197399

Passive Drag in Young Swimmers: Effects of Body Composition, Morphology and Gliding Position

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Mar 22
PMID 32197399
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The passive drag (Dp) during swimming is affected by the swimmer's morphology, body density and body position. We evaluated the relative contribution of morphology, body composition, and body position adjustments in the prediction of a swimmer's Dp. This observational study examined a sample of 60 competitive swimmers (31 male and 29 female) with a mean (±SD) age of 15.4 ± 3.1 years. The swimmer's Dp was measured using an electro-mechanical towing device and the body composition was assessed using a bioelectrical impedance analyser. Body lengths and circumferences were measured in both the standing position and the simulated streamlined position. Partial correlation analysis with age as a control variable showed that Dp was largely correlated ( < 0.05) with body mass, biacromial- and bi-iliac-breadth, streamline chest circumference and breadth. Body mass, Body Mass Index, chest circumference and streamline chest circumference showed a significant and moderate to strong effect (η2 > 0.55) on Dp. Body mass was the best predictor of Dp explaining 69% of the variability. These results indicate that swimmers with lower Dp values were: (i) slimmer, with lower fat and fat-free mass, (ii) thinner, with lower shoulder breadth, chest circumference, and streamline trunk diameters (iii), shorter, with lower streamline height. These findings can be used for talent identification in swimming, with particular reference to the gliding performance.

Citing Articles

Focus on One Swimming Stroke or Compete in Multiple: How Much Specialization Is Needed to Become a World-Class Female Swimmer?.

Born D, Lorentzen J, Ruiz-Navarro J, Stoggl T, Romann M, BjOrklund G J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025; 10(1).

PMID: 39982304 PMC: 11843929. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010064.


Improved prediction of swimming talent through random forest analysis of anthropometric and physiological phenotypes.

Liu C, Xu B, Wan K, Sun Q, Wang R, Feng Y Phenomics. 2024; 4(5):465-472.

PMID: 39723229 PMC: 11666874. DOI: 10.1007/s43657-024-00176-8.


Quantity of within-sport distance variety - what can pool swimmers and track runners learn from each other?.

Born D, Lorentzen J, BjOrklund G, Ruiz-Navarro J Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1502758.

PMID: 39698053 PMC: 11652179. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1502758.


Endurance in Long-Distance Swimming and the Use of Nutritional Aids.

Miguel-Ortega A, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Mielgo-Ayuso J Nutrients. 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599736 PMC: 11597455. DOI: 10.3390/nu16223949.


Physical performance determinants in competitive youth swimmers: a systematic review.

Price T, Cimadoro G, Legg H BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024; 16(1):20.

PMID: 38238793 PMC: 10797935. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-023-00767-4.


References
1.
Zamparo P, Cortesi M, Gatta G . The energy cost of swimming and its determinants. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019; 120(1):41-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04270-y. View

2.
Naemi R, Psycharakis S, McCabe C, Connaboy C, Sanders R . Relationships between glide efficiency and swimmers' size and shape characteristics. J Appl Biomech. 2011; 28(4):400-11. DOI: 10.1123/jab.28.4.400. View

3.
Maruyama Y, Yanai T . Abdominal breathing manoeuvre reduces passive drag acting on gliding swimmers. Sports Biomech. 2015; 14(4):413-23. DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2015.1084030. View

4.
Cortesi M, Gatta G . Effect of The Swimmer's Head Position on Passive Drag. J Hum Kinet. 2016; 49:37-45. PMC: 4723180. DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0106. View

5.
Chatard J, Lavoie J, Bourgoin B, Lacour J . The contribution of passive drag as a determinant of swimming performance. Int J Sports Med. 1990; 11(5):367-72. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1024820. View