Active and Passive Drag: the Role of Trunk Incline

Overview

Journal Eur J Appl Physiol

Specialty Physiology

Date 2009 Feb 19

PMID 19224240

Citations 24

Authors

P Zamparo

G Gatta

D Pendergast

C Capelli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of trunk incline (TI) and projected frontal area (A(eff)) in determining drag during active/passive measurements. Active drag (D(a)) was measured in competitive swimmers at speeds from 0.6 to 1.4 m s(-1); speed specific drag (D(a)/v(2)) was found to decrease as a function of v (P < 0.001) to indicate that the human body becomes more streamlined with increasing speed. Indeed, both A(eff) and TI were found to decrease with v (P < 0.001) whereas C(d) (the drag coefficient) was found to be unaffected by v. These data suggest that speed specific drag depend essentially on A(eff). Additional data indicate that A(eff) is larger during front crawl swimming than during passive towing (0.4 vs. 0.24 m(2)). This suggest that D(a)/v(2) is larger than D(p)/v(2) and, at a given speed, that D(a) is larger than D(p).

Citing Articles

Analysis of fluid force and flow fields during gliding in swimming using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method.

Liu M, Yu C, Meng Q, Hao X, Chen Z, He M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1355617.

PMID: 38846802 PMC: 11153747. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1355617.

Understanding the Importance of Drag Coefficient Assessment for a Deeper Insight into the Hydrodynamic Profile of Swimmers.

Morais J, Marinho D, Bartolomeu R, Barbosa T J Hum Kinet. 2024; 92:19-27.

PMID: 38736602 PMC: 11079927. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/172492.

Estimating Active Drag Based on Full and Semi-Tethered Swimming Tests.

Cortesi M, Gatta G, Carmigniani R, Zamparo P J Sports Sci Med. 2024; 23(1):17-24.

PMID: 38455441 PMC: 10915618. DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2024.17.

Development of a Methodology for Low-Cost 3D Underwater Motion Capture: Application to the Biomechanics of Horse Swimming.

Giraudet C, Moiroud C, Beaumont A, Gaulmin P, Hatrisse C, Azevedo E Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(21).

PMID: 37960531 PMC: 10647488. DOI: 10.3390/s23218832.

Numerical and experimental methods used to evaluate active drag in swimming: A systematic narrative review.

Lopes T, Morais J, Pinto M, Marinho D Front Physiol. 2022; 13:938658.

PMID: 36338476 PMC: 9630912. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.938658.

References

Yanai T . Rotational effect of buoyancy in frontcrawl: Does it really cause the legs to sink?. J Biomech. 2001; 34(2):235-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00186-x. View

Zamparo P . Effects of age and gender on the propelling efficiency of the arm stroke. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006; 97(1):52-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-006-0133-9. View

Zamparo P, Pendergast D, Mollendorf J, Termin A, Minetti A . An energy balance of front crawl. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005; 94(1-2):134-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-004-1281-4. View

Lavoie J, Montpetit R . Applied physiology of swimming. Sports Med. 1986; 3(3):165-89. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-198603030-00002. View

Chatard J, Lavoie J, Bourgoin B, Lacour J . The contribution of passive drag as a determinant of swimming performance. Int J Sports Med. 1990; 11(5):367-72. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1024820. View

Kjendlie P, Stallman R, Stray-Gundersen J . Passive and active floating torque during swimming. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004; 93(1-2):75-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-004-1165-7. View

di Prampero P, Pendergast D, Wilson D, RENNIE D . Energetics of swimming in man. J Appl Physiol. 1974; 37(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1974.37.1.1. View

Pendergast D, Mollendorf J, Zamparo P, Termin 2nd A, Bushnell D, Paschke D . The influence of drag on human locomotion in water. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2005; 32(1):45-57. View

Kolmogorov S, Duplishcheva O . Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force coefficient in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity. J Biomech. 1992; 25(3):311-8. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90028-y. View

10.

Kjendlie P, Stallman R . Drag characteristics of competitive swimming children and adults. J Appl Biomech. 2008; 24(1):35-42. DOI: 10.1123/jab.24.1.35. View

11.

Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Kasimatis P, Vezos N, Boli A, Mavromatis G . Reconstruction accuracy in underwater three-dimensional kinematic analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2007; 11(2):90-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.02.010. View

12.

Shuter B, Aslani A . Body surface area: Du Bois and Du Bois revisited. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000; 82(3):250-4. DOI: 10.1007/s004210050679. View

13.

Zaidi H, Taiar R, Fohanno S, Polidori G . Analysis of the effect of swimmer's head position on swimming performance using computational fluid dynamics. J Biomech. 2008; 41(6):1350-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.005. View

14.

Gronenschild E . The accuracy and reproducibility of a global method to correct for geometric image distortion in the x-ray imaging chain. Med Phys. 1998; 24(12):1875-88. DOI: 10.1118/1.598101. View

15.

Vennell R, Pease D, Wilson B . Wave drag on human swimmers. J Biomech. 2006; 39(4):664-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.023. View

16.

Chatard J, Bourgoin B, Lacour J . Passive drag is still a good evaluator of swimming aptitude. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990; 59(6):399-404. DOI: 10.1007/BF02388619. View

17.

Havriluk R . Performance level differences in swimming: a meta-analysis of passive drag force. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005; 76(2):112-8. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599273. View

18.

Mollendorf J, Termin 2nd A, Oppenheim E, Pendergast D . Effect of swim suit design on passive drag. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(6):1029-35. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000128179.02306.57. View

19.

Toussaint H, de Groot G, Savelberg H, Vervoorn K, Hollander A, van Ingen Schenau G . Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers. J Biomech. 1988; 21(5):435-8. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90149-2. View

20.

Havriluk R . Variability in measurement of swimming forces: a meta-analysis of passive and active drag. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007; 78(2):32-9. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599401. View