» Articles » PMID: 32194583

Genetic Relationships Among Portuguese Cultivated and Wild L. Germplasm

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2020 Mar 21
PMID 32194583
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The domesticated grapevine spread along the Mediterranean basin from the primary Near East domestication area, where the greatest genetic diversity is found in its ancestor, the wild vine populations. Portuguese wild populations are on the southwestern fringe of the distribution of the L. ssp in Europe. During the last Glacial Period they became isolated from the previous continuum that had been the territory of wild vine populations. Archaeological remains of domesticated grapevines in Portugal date back from 795 Before Common Era (BCE) in the lower Tagus river basin. In this work, 258 Portuguese varieties and plants were characterized using 261 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. The study of the genetic diversity of this local germplasm, its population structure and kinship, all framed in their historical and geographical backgrounds, revealed a complex network of first-degree relationships, where only Iberian varieties are involved. Some Iberian genotypes, like Alfrocheiro (Bruñal, in Spain), Sarigo (Cayetana Blanca), Mourisco Branco (Hebén), Amaral (Caiño Bravo), and Marufo (Moravia Dulce) are ancestors of a considerable fraction of all the autochthonous analyzed varieties. A part of the diversity developed was mostly local in some cases as shown by the closeness of several varieties (Vinhos Verdes) to the wild cluster in different analyses. Besides, several evidences of introgression of domesticated germplasm into wild vines was found, substantiating the high risk of genetic contamination of the subspecies. All these findings together to the known matching between the wild maternal lineage of the Iberian Peninsula and an important number of Portuguese grapevine varieties (chlorotype A), point out that some of these varieties derive, directly or indirectly, from originally local wild populations, supporting the possible occurrence of secondary events of local domestication, or, at least, of an introgression process of wild into cultivated grapevines.

Citing Articles

Seed morphometrics unravels the evolutionary history of grapevine in France.

Bouby L, Bonhomme V, Ivorra S, Bacilieri R, Ben Makhad S, Bonnaire E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22207.

PMID: 39333563 PMC: 11437209. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72692-6.


The genetic characterization of grapevines prospected in old Serbian vineyards reveals multiple relationships between traditional varieties of the Balkans.

Tello J, Todic S, Ferradas Y, Nikolic M, Sabovljevic A, Ivanisevic D Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1391679.

PMID: 39055361 PMC: 11269227. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1391679.


Genetic relationships and introgression events between wild and cultivated grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.): focus on Italian Lambruscos.

Schneider A, Ruffa P, Tumino G, Fontana M, Boccacci P, Raimondi S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12392.

PMID: 38811676 PMC: 11137023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62774-w.


Screening of Galician grapevine varieties by SNPs, phenotypic traits, and phytopathology.

Diaz-Fernandez A, Loureiro M, Pereira-Lorenzo S, Ibanez J, Diaz-Losada E Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1359506.

PMID: 38434439 PMC: 10904527. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1359506.


Exploring genetic diversity and population structure of a large grapevine ( L.) germplasm collection in Türkiye.

Kaya H, Dilli Y, Oncu-Oner T, Unal A Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1121811.

PMID: 37235025 PMC: 10208073. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1121811.


References
1.
Lijavetzky D, Cabezas J, Ibanez A, Rodriguez V, Martinez-Zapater J . High throughput SNP discovery and genotyping in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) by combining a re-sequencing approach and SNPlex technology. BMC Genomics. 2007; 8:424. PMC: 2212664. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-424. View

2.
Lacombe T, Boursiquot J, Laucou V, Di Vecchi-Staraz M, Peros J, This P . Large-scale parentage analysis in an extended set of grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 126(2):401-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1988-2. View

3.
Bourquin J, Sonko A, Otten L, Walter B . Restriction fragment length polymorphism and molecular taxonomy in Vitis vinifera L. Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 87(4):431-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00215088. View

4.
Laucou V, Launay A, Bacilieri R, Lacombe T, Adam-Blondon A, Berard A . Extended diversity analysis of cultivated grapevine Vitis vinifera with 10K genome-wide SNPs. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0192540. PMC: 5805323. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192540. View

5.
Thomas M, Matsumoto S, Cain P, Scott N . Repetitive DNA of grapevine: classes present and sequences suitable for cultivar identification. Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 86(2-3):173-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00222076. View