» Articles » PMID: 32191331

Association of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Factors With Receipt of Nondefinitive Therapy Among Younger Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Importance: Multiple randomized clinical trials have shown that definitive therapy improves overall survival among patients with high-risk prostate cancer. However, many patients do not receive definitive therapy because of sociodemographic and health-related factors.

Objective: To identify factors associated with receipt of nondefinitive therapy (NDT) among patients aged 70 years and younger with high-risk prostate cancer.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study identified 72 036 patients aged 70 years and younger with high-risk prostate cancer and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores of 2 or less who were entered in the National Cancer Database between January 2004 and December 2014. Data analysis was conducted from November 2018 to December 2019.

Exposure: Receipt of NDT as an initial treatment approach.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Survival rates were compared based on receipt of definitive therapy or NDT, and sociodemographic and health-related factors were associated with the type of therapy received. Residual life expectancy was estimated from the National Center for Health Statistics to calculate person-years of life lost.

Results: A total of 72 036 men with a median (range) age of 63 (30-70) years, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores of 2 or less, and high-risk prostate cancer without regional lymph node or distant metastatic disease were analyzed. Among eligible patients, 5252 (7.3%) received NDT as an initial therapeutic strategy. On univariate and multivariate analyses, NDT was associated with worse overall survival (univariate analysis hazard ratio, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.40-2.69; P < .001; multivariate analysis hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 2.26-2.56; P < .001). Compared with patients with private insurance or managed care, those with no insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare were more likely to receive systemic therapy only (no insurance: odds ratio [OR], 3.34; 95% CI, 2.81-3.98; P < .001; Medicaid: OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.48-3.43; P < .001; Medicare: OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20-1.53; P < .001) or no treatment (no insurance: OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.24-3.08; P < .001; Medicaid: OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.45-2.01; P < .001; Medicare: OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.24; P = .004). Compared with white patients, black patients were more likely to receive systemic therapy only (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.74-2.14; P < .001) or no treatment (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.32-1.61; P < .001), and Hispanic patients were more likely to receive systemic therapy only (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13-1.64; P = .001) or no treatment (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14-1.60; P < .001). Between 2004 and 2014, patients without insurance or enrolled in Medicaid had 1.83-fold greater person-years of life lost compared with patients with private insurance (area under the curve, 77 600 vs 42 300 person-years of life lost).

Conclusions And Relevance: In this study, receipt of NDT was associated with insurance status and race/ethnicity. While treatment decisions should be individualized for every patient, younger men with high-risk prostate cancer and minimal comorbidities should be encouraged to receive definitive local therapy regardless of other factors. These data suggest that significant barriers to life-extending treatment options for patients with prostate cancer remain.

Citing Articles

Striving for Equity: Examining Health Disparities in Urologic Oncology.

Puri D, Pandit K, Choi N, Rose B, McKay R, Bagrodia A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39518000 PMC: 11544812. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213559.


Comparing Black and White Patients in Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer and Survival in an Equal Access Health System.

Eaglehouse Y, Darmon S, Chesnut G, Shriver C, Zhu K J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024; .

PMID: 39433656 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02217-4.


Association of race/ethnicity and patient care experiences with receipt of definitive treatment among prostate cancer survivors: a SEER-CAHPS study.

Pandit A, Halpern M, Gressler L, Kamel M, Payakachat N, Li C Cancer Causes Control. 2023; 35(4):647-659.

PMID: 38001335 PMC: 11162596. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01834-4.


Evaluation of Social Determinants of Health and Prostate Cancer Outcomes Among Black and White Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Vince Jr R, Jiang R, Bank M, Quarles J, Patel M, Sun Y JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(1):e2250416.

PMID: 36630135 PMC: 9857531. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50416.


Addressing Challenges and Controversies in the Management of Prostate Cancer with Multidisciplinary Teams.

Shore N, Morgans A, El-Haddad G, Srinivas S, Abramowitz M Target Oncol. 2022; 17(6):709-725.

PMID: 36399218 PMC: 9672595. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00925-7.


References
1.
Warde P, Mason M, Ding K, Kirkbride P, Brundage M, Cowan R . Combined androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011; 378(9809):2104-11. PMC: 3243932. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61095-7. View

2.
Taksler G, Rothberg M . Assessing Years of Life Lost Versus Number of Deaths in the United States, 1995-2015. Am J Public Health. 2017; 107(10):1653-1659. PMC: 5607680. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303986. View

3.
Wong A, Safdieh J, Rineer J, Weiner J, Schwartz D, Schreiber D . A population-based analysis of contemporary patterns of care in younger men (<60 years old) with localized prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015; 47(10):1629-34. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1096-8. View

4.
Gansler T, Fedewa S, Lin C, Amin M, Jemal A, Ward E . Trends in Diagnosis of Gleason Score 2 Through 4 Prostate Cancer in the National Cancer Database, 1990-2013. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017; 141(12):1686-1696. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0611-OA. View

5.
Cykert S, Eng E, Manning M, Robertson L, Heron D, Jones N . A Multi-faceted Intervention Aimed at Black-White Disparities in the Treatment of Early Stage Cancers: The ACCURE Pragmatic Quality Improvement trial. J Natl Med Assoc. 2019; 112(5):468-477. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.03.001. View