» Articles » PMID: 22056152

Combined Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: a Randomised, Phase 3 Trial

Abstract

Background: Whether the addition of radiation therapy (RT) improves overall survival in men with locally advanced prostate cancer managed with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is unclear. Our aim was to compare outcomes in such patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Methods: Patients with: locally advanced (T3 or T4) prostate cancer (n=1057); or organ-confined disease (T2) with either a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration more than 40 ng/mL (n=119) or PSA concentration more than 20 ng/mL and a Gleason score of 8 or higher (n=25), were randomly assigned (done centrally with stratification and dynamic minimisation, not masked) to receive lifelong ADT and RT (65-69 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles, 45 Gy to the pelvic nodes). The primary endpoint was overall survival. The results presented here are of an interim analysis planned for when two-thirds of the events for the final analysis were recorded. All efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat and were based on data from all patients. This trial is registered at controlledtrials.com as ISRCTN24991896 and Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00002633.

Results: Between 1995 and 2005, 1205 patients were randomly assigned (602 in the ADT only group and 603 in the ADT and RT group); median follow-up was 6·0 years (IQR 4·4-8·0). At the time of analysis, a total of 320 patients had died, 175 in the ADT only group and 145 in the ADT and RT group. The addition of RT to ADT improved overall survival at 7 years (74%, 95% CI 70-78 vs 66%, 60-70; hazard ratio [HR] 0·77, 95% CI 0·61-0·98, p=0·033). Both toxicity and health-related quality-of-life results showed a small effect of RT on late gastrointestinal toxicity (rectal bleeding grade >3, three patients (0·5%) in the ADT only group, two (0·3%) in the ADT and RT group; diarrhoea grade >3, four patients (0·7%) vs eight (1·3%); urinary toxicity grade >3, 14 patients (2·3%) in both groups).

Interpretation: The benefits of combined modality treatment--ADT and RT--should be discussed with all patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Funding: Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, US National Cancer Institute, and UK Medical Research Council.

Citing Articles

Emerging burden of post-cancer therapy complications on unplanned hospitalisation and costs among Australian cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study over 14 years.

Mahumud R, Shahjalal M, Dahal P, Mosharaf M, Mistry S, Koly K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4709.

PMID: 39922897 PMC: 11807139. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89247-y.


Unveiling the NEFH+ malignant cell subtype: Insights from single-cell RNA sequencing in prostate cancer progression and tumor microenvironment interactions.

Wang J, Zhao F, Zhang Q, Sun Z, Xiahou Z, Wang C Front Immunol. 2025; 15:1517679.

PMID: 39759507 PMC: 11695424. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1517679.


The therapeutic use of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in prostate cancer treatment: a review of literature and ongoing trials.

Konopnicki A, Zaliznyak M, Roy M, Jana B Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):791.

PMID: 39692806 PMC: 11655789. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01680-z.


The quantitative impact of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT staging in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer and treatment-decision implications.

Abdel-Aty H, Hujairi N, Murray I, Yogeswaran Y, van As N, James N BJR Open. 2024; 6(1):tzae040.

PMID: 39606160 PMC: 11601884. DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzae040.


Quality of life and testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients: long-term data from a phase III trial.

Nabid A, Carrier N, Martin A, Bahary J, Vavassis P, Vass S Qual Life Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39565556 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03843-5.


References
1.
Monti A, Ostinelli A, Frigerio M, Cosentino D, Bossi A, Cazzaniga L . An ICRU 50 radiotherapy treatment chart. Radiother Oncol. 1995; 35(2):145-50. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01541-n. View

2.
Rosenthal S, Sandler H . Treatment strategies for high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2010; 7(1):31-8. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.237. View

3.
McMullen K, Lee W . A structured literature review to determine the use of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition of biochemical failure. Urology. 2003; 61(2):391-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02259-8. View

4.
Horwitz E, Bae K, Hanks G, Porter A, Grignon D, Brereton H . Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(15):2497-504. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9021. View

5.
Ferlay J, Shin H, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin D . Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2011; 127(12):2893-917. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25516. View