» Articles » PMID: 32182575

Atypical Processing of Uncertainty in Individuals at Risk for Psychosis

Overview
Journal Neuroimage Clin
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2020 Mar 18
PMID 32182575
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current theories of psychosis highlight the role of abnormal learning signals, i.e., prediction errors (PEs) and uncertainty, in the formation of delusional beliefs. We employed computational analyses of behaviour and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine whether such abnormalities are evident in clinical high risk (CHR) individuals. Non-medicated CHR individuals (n = 13) and control participants (n = 13) performed a probabilistic learning paradigm during fMRI data acquisition. We used a hierarchical Bayesian model to infer subject-specific computations from behaviour - with a focus on PEs and uncertainty (or its inverse, precision) at different levels, including environmental 'volatility' - and used these computational quantities for analyses of fMRI data. Computational modelling of CHR individuals' behaviour indicated volatility estimates converged to significantly higher levels than in controls. Model-based fMRI demonstrated increased activity in prefrontal and insular regions of CHR individuals in response to precision-weighted low-level outcome PEs, while activations of prefrontal, orbitofrontal and anterior insula cortex by higher-level PEs (that serve to update volatility estimates) were reduced. Additionally, prefrontal cortical activity in response to outcome PEs in CHR was negatively associated with clinical measures of global functioning. Our results suggest a multi-faceted learning abnormality in CHR individuals under conditions of environmental uncertainty, comprising higher levels of volatility estimates combined with reduced cortical activation, and abnormally high activations in prefrontal and insular areas by precision-weighted outcome PEs. This atypical representation of high- and low-level learning signals might reflect a predisposition to delusion formation.

Citing Articles

Neural correlates of uncertainty processing in psychosis spectrum disorder.

Fromm S, Wieland L, Deneault A, Heinz A, Katthagen T, Schlagenhauf F Brain Commun. 2025; 7(1):fcaf073.

PMID: 40040843 PMC: 11879018. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf073.


Are mental dysfunctions autonomous from brain dysfunctions? A perspective from the personal/subpersonal distinction.

Jurjako M Discov Ment Health. 2024; 4(1):62.

PMID: 39621201 PMC: 11612085. DOI: 10.1007/s44192-024-00117-x.


Test-retest reliability of behavioral and computational measures of advice taking under volatility.

Karvelis P, Hauke D, Wobmann M, Andreou C, Mackintosh A, de Bock R PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0312255.

PMID: 39556555 PMC: 11573178. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312255.


Prefrontal transthalamic uncertainty processing drives flexible switching.

Lam N, Mukherjee A, Wimmer R, Nassar M, Chen Z, Halassa M Nature. 2024; 637(8044):127-136.

PMID: 39537928 PMC: 11841214. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08180-8.


A prefrontal thalamocortical readout for conflict-related executive dysfunction in schizophrenia.

Huang A, Wimmer R, Lam N, Wang B, Suresh S, Roeske M Cell Rep Med. 2024; 5(11):101802.

PMID: 39515319 PMC: 11604477. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101802.


References
1.
Dayan P, Hinton G, Neal R, Zemel R . The Helmholtz machine. Neural Comput. 1995; 7(5):889-904. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1995.7.5.889. View

2.
Allen P, Stephan K, Mechelli A, Day F, Ward N, Dalton J . Cingulate activity and fronto-temporal connectivity in people with prodromal signs of psychosis. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(1):947-55. PMC: 3221036. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.038. View

3.
Corlett P, Krystal J, Taylor J, Fletcher P . Why do delusions persist?. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009; 3:12. PMC: 2713737. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.09.012.2009. View

4.
Falkenberg I, Valmaggia L, Byrnes M, Frascarelli M, Jones C, Rocchetti M . Why are help-seeking subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis help-seeking?. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 228(3):808-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.018. View

5.
Owen M . New approaches to psychiatric diagnostic classification. Neuron. 2014; 84(3):564-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.028. View