» Articles » PMID: 32175901

Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Two Years Follow-up

Overview
Date 2020 Mar 17
PMID 32175901
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to compare cemented (CHA) and uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (UCH) in patients with femoral neck fractures (FNF).

Methods: The study included 158 patients aged ≥76 years who underwent bipolar HA for displaced FNF. Patients were randomized in two groups: the cemented group (CHA, n=79) was treated with cement and the uncemented group (UCH, n=79) without cement. The groups were compared for operating time, blood loss and peroperative morbidity and mortality rates.

Results: Both the CHA and the UCH group did not differ significantly in terms of age (86±5 vs. 84±4 years), sex (58.3% male vs. 60.7% female), and comorbidities (p=0.49). The CHA group had a significantly longer operating time (p=0.038) and a greater intraoperative blood loss (p=0.024). In the CHA group there were 8 (10.1%) events of intraoperative drop in the oxygen saturation (SaO2), whereas no such events were noted in the UCH group (p=0.009). Despite no significant difference between these two groups, we found that the CHA group was associated with a higher early postoperative mortality (8.8% in the CHA group versus 3.8% in the UCH group, p=0.009). Intraoperative fracture occurred in two patients (2.5%) of the UCH group. Over a 2-year follow-up period there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the rate of dislocation (p=0.56) or rate of postoperative periprosthetic fracture (p=0.56). There was a trend towards a better postoperative functional recovery at 6 week for the CHA group (77.1±13.1 versus 71.3±16.3), although the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the end of 2 years was comparable (p=0.55).

Conclusion: Both CHA and UCH are acceptable methods for treating displaced femoral neck fractures. However, based on our results perioperative cardiovascular disturbances are less frequent and resulting in a potential lower early mortality with UCH. Therefore, UCH is particularly appropriate for elderly patients with pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Citing Articles

The Health-Related Quality of Life for Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Samaheen M, Mohammad M, Salzmann M, Ramadanov N Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(2):361-372.

PMID: 39726286 PMC: 11787973. DOI: 10.1111/os.14339.


A meta-analysis comparing the effects of cemented and uncemented prostheses on wound infection and pain in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Xu Z, Zhang K, Cheng K, Sun G, Zhang Y, Jia J Int Wound J. 2023; 20(10):4122-4129.

PMID: 37555547 PMC: 10681411. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14306.


The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

He Y, Tang X, Liao Y, Liu S, Li L, Li P Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(7):1719-1729.

PMID: 37154088 PMC: 10350391. DOI: 10.1111/os.13716.


Cemented vs Uncemented hemiarthroplasties for femoral neck fractures: An overlapping systematic review and evidence appraisal.

Reddy A, Scott J, Norris G, Moore C, Checketts J, Hughes G PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281090.

PMID: 36827316 PMC: 9955942. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281090.


A systematic review and meta-analysis of cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years old.

Fu M, Shen J, Ren Z, Lv Y, Wang J, Jiang W Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1085485.

PMID: 36817792 PMC: 9932906. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1085485.


References
1.
DeAngelis J, Ademi A, Staff I, Lewis C . Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized trial with early follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 26(3):135-40. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318238b7a5. View

2.
Hynes M, Calder P, Rosenfeld P, Scott G . The use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss during total hip arthroplasty: an observational study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005; 87(2):99-101. PMC: 1963881. DOI: 10.1308/147870805X28118. View

3.
Luo X, He S, Li Z, Huang D . Systematic review of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in older patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011; 132(4):455-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1436-9. View

4.
Duckworth A, Phillips S, Stone O, Moran M, Breusch S, Biant L . Deep infection after hip fracture surgery: predictors of early mortality. Injury. 2012; 43(7):1182-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.029. View

5.
Azegami S, Gurusamy K, Parker M . Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Hip Int. 2011; 21(5):509-17. DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8640. View