» Articles » PMID: 32872057

Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Elderly Patients with Displaced Fracture of the Femoral Neck: A PRISMA-compliant Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Sep 3
PMID 32872057
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis was performed to incorporate newly published, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effects of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with displaced fracture of the femoral neck.

Methods: The following electronic databases were extensively searched from the inception of the database through December 2018: EMBASE, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. RCTs focusing on the outcomes of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty were reviewed and screened for eligibility. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager Software to perform meta-analyses. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the study quality and bias risk through the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Use fixed effect model or random effect model to pooled data. Cochran's Q statistic was used to evaluate heterogeneity, and I statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity.

Results: Fifteen RCTs were enrolled (n = 3790) (uncemented hemiarthroplasty group = 1015; cemented hemiarthroplasty group = 1037) (mean age ranged from 70-85.3 years; all patients > 65 years). The meta-analysis showed that cemented hemiarthroplasty has a longer operating time (weighted mean difference, 8.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.83-11.23; P < .00001), less pain (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI 4.83-11.23; P = .02), lower mortality 1-year (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.98; P = .03) and fewer implant-related complications (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI 0.13-0.30; P < .00001) than Uncemented hemiarthroplasty. However, there are still some limitations in our study, such as the uniformity of the surgery administration programme and rehabilitation scheme, and the small sample size of the included studies.

Conclusions: Cemented hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with displaced fracture of femoral neck may acquire better functional results.

Citing Articles

The Health-Related Quality of Life for Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Samaheen M, Mohammad M, Salzmann M, Ramadanov N Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(2):361-372.

PMID: 39726286 PMC: 11787973. DOI: 10.1111/os.14339.


Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures is associated with Higher Perioperative Surgical Complications but Lower Medical Complications: Analysis from the National Inpatient Database.

Purudappa P, Berliner Z, Venishetty N, Aggarwal V, Serbin P, Mounasamy V Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023; 11(9):582-587.

PMID: 37868136 PMC: 10585485. DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.70498.3307.


The Bone Cement Hypercoagulation Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Mortality, and Prevention.

Dahl O, Pripp A, Jaradeh M, Fareed J Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023; 29:10760296231198036.

PMID: 37792504 PMC: 10552457. DOI: 10.1177/10760296231198036.


Cemented vs Uncemented hemiarthroplasties for femoral neck fractures: An overlapping systematic review and evidence appraisal.

Reddy A, Scott J, Norris G, Moore C, Checketts J, Hughes G PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281090.

PMID: 36827316 PMC: 9955942. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281090.


Hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture in patients older than 80 years: A randomized trial protocol.

Peng L, Liu H, Hu X, Liu J Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(50):e23530.

PMID: 33327300 PMC: 7738070. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023530.

References
1.
Taylor F, Wright M, Zhu M . Hemiarthroplasty of the hip with and without cement: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(7):577-83. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00006. View

2.
Morris K, Davies H, Wronka K . Implant-related complications following hip hemiarthroplasty: a comparison of modern cemented and uncemented prostheses. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(7):1161-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1671-9. View

3.
Figved W, Opland V, Frihagen F, Jervidalo T, Madsen J, Nordsletten L . Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(9):2426-35. PMC: 2866935. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0672-y. View

4.
Vidovic D, Matejcic A, Punda M, Ivica M, Tomljenovic M, Bekavac-Beslin M . Periprosthetic bone loss following hemiarthroplasty: a comparison between cemented and cementless hip prosthesis. Injury. 2013; 44 Suppl 3:S62-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70201-8. View

5.
Sonne-Holm S, Walter S, Jensen J . Moore hemi-arthroplasty with and without bone cement in femoral neck fractures. A clinical controlled trial. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982; 53(6):953-6. DOI: 10.3109/17453678208992854. View