» Articles » PMID: 32172145

Natural Variability in Seizure Frequency: Implications for Trials and Placebo

Overview
Journal Epilepsy Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Mar 16
PMID 32172145
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Changes in patient-reported seizure frequencies are the gold standard used to test efficacy of new treatments in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Recent analyses of patient seizure diary data suggest that the placebo response may be attributable to natural fluctuations in seizure frequency, though the evidence is incomplete. Here we develop a data-driven statistical model and assess the impact of the model on interpretation of placebo response.

Methods: A synthetic seizure diary generator matching statistical properties seen across multiple epilepsy diary datasets was constructed. The model was used to simulate the placebo arm of 5000 RCTs. A meta-analysis of 23 historical RCTs was compared to the simulations.

Results: The placebo 50 %-responder rate (RR50) was 27.3 ± 3.6 % (simulated) and 21.1 ± 10.0 % (historical). The placebo median percent change (MPC) was 22.0 ± 6.0 % (simulated) and 16.7 ± 10.3 % (historical).

Conclusions: A statistical model of daily seizure count generation which incorporates quantities related to the natural fluctuations of seizure count data produces a placebo response comparable to those seen in historical RCTs. This model may be useful in better understanding the seizure count fluctuations seen in patients in other clinical settings.

Citing Articles

Factors associated with placebo response rate in randomized controlled trials of antiseizure medications for focal epilepsy.

Kerr W, Suprun M, Kok N, Reddy A, McFarlane K, Kwan P Epilepsia. 2024; 66(2):407-416.

PMID: 39707877 PMC: 11827720. DOI: 10.1111/epi.18197.


The present and future of seizure detection, prediction, and forecasting with machine learning, including the future impact on clinical trials.

Kerr W, McFarlane K, Pucci G Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1425490.

PMID: 39055320 PMC: 11269262. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1425490.


Demonstration of Group-Level and Individual-Level Efficacy Using Time-to-Event Designs for Clinical Trials of Antiseizure Medications.

Kerr W, Kok N, Reddy A, McFarlane K, Stern J, Pennell P Neurology. 2024; 103(4):e209713.

PMID: 39052963 PMC: 11271390. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209713.


Minimum clinical utility standards for wearable seizure detectors: A simulation study.

Goldenholz D, Karoly P, Viana P, Nurse E, Loddenkemper T, Schulze-Bonhage A Epilepsia. 2024; 65(4):1017-1028.

PMID: 38366862 PMC: 11018505. DOI: 10.1111/epi.17917.


Increasing challenges to trial recruitment and conduct over time.

Kerr W, Reddy A, Seo S, Kok N, Stacey W, Stern J Epilepsia. 2023; 64(10):2625-2634.

PMID: 37440282 PMC: 10592378. DOI: 10.1111/epi.17716.


References
1.
Rheims S, Perucca E, Cucherat M, Ryvlin P . Factors determining response to antiepileptic drugs in randomized controlled trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsia. 2011; 52(2):219-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02915.x. View

2.
Zaccara G, Giovannelli F, Schmidt D . Placebo and nocebo responses in drug trials of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015; 43:128-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.004. View

3.
Tlusta E, Handoko K, Majoie M, Egberts T, Vlcek J, Heerdink E . Clinical relevance of patients with epilepsy included in clinical trials. Epilepsia. 2008; 49(8):1479-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01618_2.x. View

4.
Arroyo S, Anhut H, Kugler A, Lee C, Knapp L, Garofalo E . Pregabalin add-on treatment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study in adults with partial seizures. Epilepsia. 2003; 45(1):20-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.31203.x. View

5.
Alosh M . The impact of missing data in a generalized integer-valued autoregression model for count data. J Biopharm Stat. 2010; 19(6):1039-54. DOI: 10.1080/10543400903242787. View