» Articles » PMID: 39055320

The Present and Future of Seizure Detection, Prediction, and Forecasting with Machine Learning, Including the Future Impact on Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jul 26
PMID 39055320
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Seizures have a profound impact on quality of life and mortality, in part because they can be challenging both to detect and forecast. Seizure detection relies upon accurately differentiating transient neurological symptoms caused by abnormal epileptiform activity from similar symptoms with different causes. Seizure forecasting aims to identify when a person has a high or low likelihood of seizure, which is related to seizure prediction. Machine learning and artificial intelligence are data-driven techniques integrated with neurodiagnostic monitoring technologies that attempt to accomplish both of those tasks. In this narrative review, we describe both the existing software and hardware approaches for seizure detection and forecasting, as well as the concepts for how to evaluate the performance of new technologies for future application in clinical practice. These technologies include long-term monitoring both with and without electroencephalography (EEG) that report very high sensitivity as well as reduced false positive detections. In addition, we describe the implications of seizure detection and forecasting upon the evaluation of novel treatments for seizures within clinical trials. Based on these existing data, long-term seizure detection and forecasting with machine learning and artificial intelligence could fundamentally change the clinical care of people with seizures, but there are multiple validation steps necessary to rigorously demonstrate their benefits and costs, relative to the current standard.

Citing Articles

Chasing the Holy Grail: Seizure Prediction Through Neural Cycles.

Englot D Epilepsy Curr. 2024; :15357597241281842.

PMID: 39539397 PMC: 11556539. DOI: 10.1177/15357597241281842.

References
1.
Luke W, Seow Chong L, Ban K, Wong A, Zhi Xiong C, Shuh Shing L . Is ChatGPT 'ready' to be a learning tool for medical undergraduates and will it perform equally in different subjects? Comparative study of ChatGPT performance in tutorial and case-based learning questions in physiology and biochemistry. Med Teach. 2024; 46(11):1441-1447. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2308779. View

2.
Varoquaux G . Cross-validation failure: Small sample sizes lead to large error bars. Neuroimage. 2017; 180(Pt A):68-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.061. View

3.
Goldenholz D, Goldenholz S . Response to placebo in clinical epilepsy trials--Old ideas and new insights. Epilepsy Res. 2016; 122:15-25. PMC: 4828269. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.02.002. View

4.
Saboo K, Cao Y, Kremen V, Sladky V, Gregg N, Arnold P . Individualized Seizure Cluster Prediction Using Machine Learning and Chronic Ambulatory Intracranial EEG. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2023; 22(4):818-827. PMC: 10702269. DOI: 10.1109/TNB.2023.3275037. View

5.
LaGrant B, Goldenholz D, Braun M, Moss R, Grinspan Z . Patterns of Recording Epileptic Spasms in an Electronic Seizure Diary Compared With Video-EEG and Historical Cohorts. Pediatr Neurol. 2021; 122:27-34. PMC: 10164279. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.04.008. View