» Articles » PMID: 32167478

Comparative Usability Analysis and Parental Preferences of Three Web-Based Knowledge Translation Tools: Multimethod Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2020 Mar 14
PMID 32167478
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Connecting parents to research evidence is known to improve health decision making. However, guidance on how to develop effective knowledge translation (KT) tools that synthesize child-health evidence into a form understandable by parents is lacking.

Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative usability analysis of three Web-based KT tools to identify differences in tool effectiveness, identify which format parents prefer, and better understand what factors affect usability for parents.

Methods: We evaluated a Cochrane plain language summary (PLS), Blogshot, and a Wikipedia page on a specific child-health topic (acute otitis media). A mixed method approach was used involving a knowledge test, written usability questionnaire, and a semistructured interview. Differences in knowledge and usability questionnaire scores for each of the KT tools were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests, considering a critical significance value of P=.05. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize and identify common parent preferences among the semistructured interviews. Key elements parents wanted in a KT tool were derived through author consensus using questionnaire data and parent interviews.

Results: In total, 16 parents (9 female) with a mean age of 39.6 (SD 11.9) years completed the study. Parents preferred the Blogshot over the PLS and Wikipedia page (P=.002) and found the Blogshot to be the most aesthetic (P=.001) and easiest to use (P=.001). Knowledge questions and usability survey data also indicated that the Blogshot was the most preferred and effective KT tool at relaying information about the topic. Four key themes were derived from thematic analysis, describing elements parents valued in KT tools. Parents wanted tools that were (1) simple, (2) quick to access and use, and (3) trustworthy, and which (4) informed how to manage the condition. Out of the three KT tools assessed, Blogshots were the most preferred tool by parents and encompassed these four key elements.

Conclusions: It is important that child health evidence be available in formats accessible and understandable by parents to improve decision making, use of health care resources, and health outcomes. Further usability testing of different KT tools should be conducted involving broader populations and other conditions (eg, acute vs chronic) to generate guidelines to improve KT tools for parents.

Citing Articles

Practices and Barriers in Developing and Disseminating Plain-Language Resources Reporting Medical Research Information: A Scoping Review.

Pal A, Arnet I, Elger B, Wangmo T Patient. 2024; 17(5):493-518.

PMID: 38878237 PMC: 11343906. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00700-y.


Parents' User Experience Accessing and Using a Web-Based Map of COVID-19 Recommendations for Health Decision-Making: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Cyrkot S, Hartling L, Scott S, Elliott S JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e53593.

PMID: 38506915 PMC: 10956570. DOI: 10.2196/53593.


'It's quite a balancing act': A qualitative study of parents' experiences and information needs related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hartling L, Elliott S, Wright K, Knisley L, Scott S Health Expect. 2024; 27(1):e13994.

PMID: 38389163 PMC: 10884360. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13994.


Knowledge mobilization activities to support decision-making by youth, parents, and adults using a systematic and living map of evidence and recommendations on COVID-19: protocol for three randomized controlled trials and qualitative user-experience....

Charide R, Stallwood L, Munan M, Sayfi S, Hartling L, Butcher N Trials. 2023; 24(1):27.

PMID: 36641457 PMC: 9840541. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07067-9.


A Novel Hospital-to-Home System for Children With Medical Complexities: Usability Testing Study.

Bird M, Carter N, Lim A, Kazmie N, Fajardo C, Reaume S JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(8):e34572.

PMID: 35969456 PMC: 9419046. DOI: 10.2196/34572.


References
1.
Marquez C, Johnson A, Jassemi S, Park J, Moore J, Blaine C . Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1):84. PMC: 6014014. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9. View

2.
Arienti C, Gimigliano F, Ryan-Vig S, Kiekens C, Negrini S . Cochrane Rehabilitation blogshots: a modern method to spread Cochrane Evidence. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018; 54(3):466-468. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05313-3. View

3.
Kothari A, Wathen C . Integrated knowledge translation: digging deeper, moving forward. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017; 71(6):619-623. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2016-208490. View

4.
Buljan I, Malicki M, Wager E, Puljak L, Hren D, Kellie F . No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 97():86-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.003. View

5.
Dube E, De Wals P, Gilca V, Boulianne N, Ouakki M, Lavoie F . Burden of acute otitis media on Canadian families. Can Fam Physician. 2011; 57(1):60-5. PMC: 3024167. View