» Articles » PMID: 20434023

User Testing and Stakeholder Feedback Contributed to the Development of Understandable and Useful Summary of Findings Tables for Cochrane Reviews

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2010 May 4
PMID 20434023
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a Summary of Findings (SoF) table for use in Cochrane reviews that is understandable and useful for health professionals, acceptable to Cochrane Collaboration stakeholders, and feasible to implement.

Study Design And Setting: We gathered stakeholder feedback on the format and content of an SoF table from an advisory group of more than 50 participants and their constituencies through e-mail consultations. We conducted user tests using a think-aloud protocol method, collecting feedback from 21 health professionals and researchers in Norway and the UK. We analyzed the feedback, defined problem areas, and generated new solutions in brainstorming workshops.

Results: Stakeholders were concerned about precision in the data representation and about production feasibility. User testing revealed unexpected comprehension problems, mainly confusion about what the different numbers referred to (class reference). Resolving the tension between achieving table precision and table simplicity became the main focus of the working group.

Conclusion: User testing led to a table more useful and understandable for clinical audiences. We arrived at an SoF table that was acceptable to the stakeholders and in principle feasible to implement technically. Some challenges remain, including presenting continuous outcomes and technical/editorial implementation.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the impact of the global evidence, local adaptation (GELA) project for enhancing evidence-informed guideline recommendations for newborn and young child health in three African countries: a mixed-methods protocol.

Kredo T, Effa E, Mbeye N, Mabetha D, Schmidt B, Rohwer A Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):114.

PMID: 39160559 PMC: 11334341. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01189-5.


Effectiveness of hospital-to-home transitional care interventions and consultation for implementation in Sudan: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

Mohamedsharif A, Elfeaki M, Bushra R, Gemperli A Front Health Serv. 2024; 3:1288575.

PMID: 38162192 PMC: 10755884. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1288575.


Infographic summaries for clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing of the BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care.

Van Bostraeten P, Aertgeerts B, Bekkering G, Delvaux N, Dijckmans C, Ostyn E BMJ Open. 2023; 13(11):e071847.

PMID: 37945307 PMC: 10649784. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071847.


Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study.

Matas J, Tokalic R, Garcia-Costa D, Lopez-Inesta E, Alvarez-Garcia E, Grimaldo F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18044.

PMID: 37872203 PMC: 10593927. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45359-x.


The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence.

Page M, Moher D, Brennan S, McKenzie J Syst Rev. 2023; 12(1):196.

PMID: 37833767 PMC: 10571343. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6.