» Articles » PMID: 32158417

Lean on Me: A Scoping Review of the Essence of Workplace Support Among Child Welfare Workers

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2020 Mar 12
PMID 32158417
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Child welfare workers (CWWs) often work under conditions similar in nature to workers within safety critical organizations (SCOs). This is because most of their work surrounds child neglect, securing homes for foster children, haphazard, and intricate cases, among other things, and where making wrong decisions, inattention to details, and the likes could lead to adverse consequences especially for the kids within their care. Research has shown that employees who experience support at work often report less stress symptoms, burnout, and a host of other negative workplace experiences. Experience of support at work has also been found to boost employees' retention, job satisfaction, and productivity. Despite this development, research exploring the essence of workplace support among CWW is very scarce in the literature, and we know very little about the type of workplace support and their influence on a host of workplace outcomes, especially the negative ones like secondary traumatic stress, aggression, and violence toward CWWs. The purpose of the current scoping review was to uncover what is known about workplace support and their relationship with workplace outcomes among CWWs. The authors explored four databases and identified 55 primary studies investigating workplace support and workplace outcomes among CWWs in the review. Studies mostly framed support under three main support types of coworker/peer support, social/organizational/management support, and supervisor/leadership support. Findings showed that workplace support has a positive impact on workplace variables like job satisfaction, engagement, commitment, and reduces the risk of turnover, burnout, and other negative workplace variables. The review highlights possible directions for future research.

Citing Articles

Looking at both sides, outcomes of positive workplace relational systems: A phenomenological study.

Fiaz S, Qureshi M Heliyon. 2023; 9(4):e15442.

PMID: 37123959 PMC: 10130865. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15442.


Diagnostic model for preschool workers' unwillingness to continue working: Developed using machine-learning techniques.

Matsuo M, Matsumoto K, Higashijima M, Shirabe S, Tanaka G, Yoshida Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(2):e32630.

PMID: 36637924 PMC: 9839289. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032630.


Child Welfare Reform: A Scoping Review.

McTavish J, McKee C, Tanaka M, MacMillan H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21).

PMID: 36360960 PMC: 9655914. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114071.

References
1.
Pham M, Rajic A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S . A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(4):371-85. PMC: 4491356. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. View

2.
Dagan S, Ben-Porat A, Itzhaky H . Child protection workers dealing with child abuse: The contribution of personal, social and organizational resources to secondary traumatization. Child Abuse Negl. 2015; 51:203-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.008. View

3.
Bride B . Prevalence of secondary traumatic stress among social workers. Soc Work. 2007; 52(1):63-70. DOI: 10.1093/sw/52.1.63. View

4.
Fryer Jr G, Miyoshi T, Thomas P . The relationship of child protection worker attitudes to attrition from the field. Child Abuse Negl. 1989; 13(3):345-50. DOI: 10.1016/0145-2134(89)90074-4. View

5.
He A, Phillips J, Lizano E, Rienks S, Leake R . Examining internal and external job resources in child welfare: Protecting against caseworker burnout. Child Abuse Negl. 2018; 81:48-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.013. View