Cell Phone Based ECG Monitoring: Old Wine in New Bottle, or Something Better?

Overview

Journal Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J

Date 2020 Mar 12

PMID 32156638

Citations 1

Authors

Aparna Jaswal

Anil Saxena

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Dynamic and conventional electrocardiograms for diagnosing arrhythmic coronary atherosclerotic heart disease: a comparative analysis.

Hu X, Tong H Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(5):5697-5701.

PMID: 34150179 PMC: 8205682.

References

Locati E, Moya A, Oliveira M, Tanner H, Willems R, Lunati M . External prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring in unexplained syncope and palpitations: results of the SYNARR-Flash study. Europace. 2015; 18(8):1265-72. PMC: 4974630. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv311. View

Rothman S, Laughlin J, Seltzer J, Walia J, Baman R, Siouffi S . The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18(3):241-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00729.x. View

Mittal S, Movsowitz C, Steinberg J . Ambulatory external electrocardiographic monitoring: focus on atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(17):1741-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.026. View

Kennedy H . The history, science, and innovation of Holter technology. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2006; 11(1):85-94. PMC: 6932486. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2006.00067.x. View

Reiffel J, Schwarzberg R, Murry M . Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95(9):1055-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.025. View

Karunadas C, Mathew C . Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019; 20(2):49-53. PMC: 7082686. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013. View

HOLTER N . New method for heart studies. Science. 1961; 134(3486):1214-20. DOI: 10.1126/science.134.3486.1214. View

Vasamreddy C, Dalal D, Dong J, Cheng A, Spragg D, Lamiy S . Symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17(2):134-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00359.x. View

Kumar S, Nagesh C, Singh M, Pandian A, DeLurgio D, Khan B . Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of SanketLife - A wireless, pocket-sized ECG biosensor, in comparison to standard 12 lead ECG in the detection of cardiovascular diseases in a tertiary care setting. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019; 20(2):54-59. PMC: 7082670. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.011. View

10.

Del Mar B . The history of clinical Holter Monitoring. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005; 10(2):226-30. PMC: 6932614. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.10202.x. View

11.

Hanke T, Charitos E, Stierle U, Karluss A, Kraatz E, Graf B . Twenty-four-hour holter monitor follow-up does not provide accurate heart rhythm status after surgical atrial fibrillation ablation therapy: up to 12 months experience with a novel permanently implantable heart rhythm monitor device. Circulation. 2009; 120(11 Suppl):S177-84. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.838474. View

12.

Rosenberg M, Samuel M, Thosani A, Zimetbaum P . Use of a noninvasive continuous monitoring device in the management of atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012; 36(3):328-33. PMC: 3618372. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12053. View

13.

Charitos E, Stierle U, Ziegler P, Baldewig M, Robinson D, Sievers H . A comprehensive evaluation of rhythm monitoring strategies for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from 647 continuously monitored patients and implications for monitoring after therapeutic interventions. Circulation. 2012; 126(7):806-14. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098079. View