» Articles » PMID: 32141666

Sex-specific Telomere Length and Dynamics in Relation to Age and Reproductive Success in Cory's Shearwaters

Overview
Journal Mol Ecol
Date 2020 Mar 7
PMID 32141666
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individuals in free-living animal populations generally differ substantially in reproductive success, lifespan and other fitness-related traits, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this variation are poorly understood. Telomere length and dynamics are candidate traits explaining this variation, as long telomeres predict a higher survival probability and telomere loss has been shown to reflect experienced "life stress." However, telomere dynamics among very long-lived species are unresolved. Additionally, it is generally not well understood how telomeres relate to reproductive success or sex. We measured telomere length and dynamics in erythrocytes to assess their relationship to age, sex and reproduction in Cory's shearwaters (Calonectris borealis), a long-lived seabird, in the context of a long-term study. Adult males had on average 231 bp longer telomeres than females, independent of age. In females, telomere length changed relatively little with age, whereas male telomere length declined significantly. Telomere shortening within males from one year to the next was three times higher than the interannual shortening rate based on cross-sectional data of males. Past long-term reproductive success was sex-specifically reflected in age-corrected telomere length: males with on average high fledgling production were characterized by shorter telomeres, whereas successful females had longer telomeres, and we discuss hypotheses that may explain this contrast. In conclusion, telomere length and dynamics in relation to age and reproduction are sex-dependent in Cory's shearwaters and these findings contribute to our understanding of what characterises individual variation in fitness.

Citing Articles

Telomere- and oxidative stress dynamics in Psittacidae species with different longevity trajectories.

Dominguez-de-Barros A, Sifaoui I, Dorta-Guerra R, Lorenzo-Morales J, Castro-Fuentes R, Cordoba-Lanus E Geroscience. 2024; 47(1):121-134.

PMID: 39448517 PMC: 11872948. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01397-5.


A meta-analysis on the heritability of vertebrate telomere length.

Chik H, Sparks A, Schroeder J, Dugdale H J Evol Biol. 2022; 35(10):1283-1295.

PMID: 35932478 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14071.


The Power of Stress: The Telo-Hormesis Hypothesis.

Jacome Burbano M, Gilson E Cells. 2021; 10(5).

PMID: 34064566 PMC: 8151059. DOI: 10.3390/cells10051156.


Longer telomeres during early life predict higher lifetime reproductive success in females but not males.

Heidinger B, Kucera A, Kittilson J, Westneat D Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1951):20210560.

PMID: 34034512 PMC: 8150037. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0560.


Costs of reproduction and migration are paid in later return to the colony, not in physical condition, in a long-lived seabird.

Gatt M, Versteegh M, Bauch C, Tieleman B, Granadeiro J, Catry P Oecologia. 2020; 195(2):287-297.

PMID: 33040163 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04775-w.


References
1.
Bauch C, Boonekamp J, Korsten P, Mulder E, Verhulst S . Epigenetic inheritance of telomere length in wild birds. PLoS Genet. 2019; 15(2):e1007827. PMC: 6375570. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007827. View

2.
Austad S, Fischer K . Sex Differences in Lifespan. Cell Metab. 2016; 23(6):1022-1033. PMC: 4932837. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.019. View

3.
Bauch C, Riechert J, Verhulst S, Becker P . Telomere length reflects reproductive effort indicated by corticosterone levels in a long-lived seabird. Mol Ecol. 2016; 25(22):5785-5794. DOI: 10.1111/mec.13874. View

4.
Olsson M, Pauliny A, Wapstra E, Uller T, Schwartz T, Miller E . Sexual differences in telomere selection in the wild. Mol Ecol. 2011; 20(10):2085-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05085.x. View

5.
Watson H, Bolton M, Monaghan P . Variation in early-life telomere dynamics in a long-lived bird: links to environmental conditions and survival. J Exp Biol. 2015; 218(Pt 5):668-74. PMC: 4376192. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.104265. View