» Articles » PMID: 32140913

Population Pharmacokinetics of Busulfan in Saudi Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 2020 Mar 7
PMID 32140913
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Busulfan is an antineoplastic drug that is used widely as part of a conditioning regimen in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It has a narrow therapeutic index and highly variable pharmacokinetics; therefore therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize busulfan dosing. Objective To study the population pharmacokinetics of busulfan in Saudi pediatric patients to optimize its dosing. Settings King Abdullah Specialist Children's Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods This pharmacokinetic observational study was conducted between January 2016 and December 2018. All pediatric patients receiving IV busulfan and undergoing routine therapeutic drug monitoring were included. Population pharmacokinetics modeling was conducted using Monolix2019R1. Pharmacokinetic data of busulfan in children. Results The study included 59 patients and 513 samples. The mean ± SD age was 6.10 ± 3.17 years, and the dose administered was 0.994 ± 0.15 mg/kg. The mean ± SD Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) were 900.60 ± 402.8 ng/mL and 1031.14 ± 300.75 µM min, respectively. Based on our simulations, the European Medicines Agency recommended dose were adequate for most patient's groups to achieve the conventional target of an AUC of 900-1350 µM min. For patients in the lower weight group < 9 kg, higher doses were need at 1.2 mg/kg. With regards to the newly proposed target of AUC 78-101 mg h/mL, all of the doses we tested had low probability of achieving it. Conclusions Most of our patients had less than a proportional increase in busulfan concentration suggesting autoinduction. The high interindividual variability and autoinduction make dose adjustments challenging and AUC at steady state difficult to predict from the first dose. One approach to improve dose predictions is to use Bayesian dosing software. Based on our simulations, the European Medicines Agency recommended doses were adequate for most patient groups, except those in the lower (< 9 kg) and higher weight groups (> 34 kg).

Citing Articles

Simulation-Based Optimization of Sampling Schedules for Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Once-Daily and 4-Times-Daily Busulfan in Pediatric Patients.

Ben Hassine K, Daali Y, Gloor Y, Nava T, Theoret Y, Krajinovic M Ther Drug Monit. 2024; .

PMID: 38885146 PMC: 11554249. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001217.


Therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines in oncology: what do we know and how to move forward? Insights from a systematic review.

Li X, Song Z, Yi Z, Qin J, Jiang D, Wang Z Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241250130.

PMID: 38812991 PMC: 11135096. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241250130.


Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Intravenous Busulfan in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Comparative Simulations.

Takahashi T, Jaber M, Brown S, Al-Kofahi M Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023; 62(7):955-968.

PMID: 37415003 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01275-x.


Utilization of a Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Improve a Busulfan Test-Dose Strategy in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.

Dunlap T, Weiner D, Kemper R, Kardouh M, DeVane S, Symonds A J Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 63(9):1026-1035.

PMID: 37122163 PMC: 10524401. DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2257.


Can First-Dose Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Predict the Steady State Area Under the Blood Concentration-Time Curve of Busulfan in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation?.

Alsultan A, Albassam A, Alturki A, Alsultan A, Essa M, Almuzzaini B Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:834773.

PMID: 35463912 PMC: 9021690. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.834773.

References
1.
Michel G, Valteau-Couanet D, Gentet J, Esperou H, Socie G, Mechinaud F . Weight-based strategy of dose administration in children using intravenous busulfan: clinical and pharmacokinetic results. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011; 58(1):90-7. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22959. View

2.
Buffery P, Allen K, Chin P, Moore G, Barclay M, Begg E . Thirteen years' experience of pharmacokinetic monitoring and dosing of busulfan: can the strategy be improved?. Ther Drug Monit. 2013; 36(1):86-92. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31829dc940. View

3.
Bartelink I, Lalmohamed A, van Reij E, Dvorak C, Savic R, Zwaveling J . Association of busulfan exposure with survival and toxicity after haemopoietic cell transplantation in children and young adults: a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2016; 3(11):e526-e536. PMC: 5159247. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30114-4. View

4.
ten Brink M, Zwaveling J, Swen J, Bredius R, Lankester A, Guchelaar H . Personalized busulfan and treosulfan conditioning for pediatric stem cell transplantation: the role of pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics. Drug Discov Today. 2014; 19(10):1572-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.04.005. View

5.
Hoy S, Lyseng-Williamson K . Intravenous busulfan: in the conditioning treatment of pediatric patients prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Paediatr Drugs. 2007; 9(4):271-8. DOI: 10.2165/00148581-200709040-00008. View