» Articles » PMID: 22742881

Busulfan Pharmacokinetics Following Intravenous and Oral Dosing Regimens in Children Receiving High-dose Myeloablative Chemotherapy for High-risk Neuroblastoma As Part of the HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN Trial

Overview
Journal Eur J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2012 Jun 30
PMID 22742881
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Busulfan is widely used in a neuroblastoma setting, with several studies reporting marked inter-patient variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The current study reports on the pharmacokinetics of oral versus intravenous (IV) busulfan in high-risk neuroblastoma patients treated on the European HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN study.

Methods: Busulfan was administered four times daily for 4 days to children aged 0.7-13.1 years, either orally (1.45-1.55 mg/kg) or by the IV route (0.8-1.2mg/kg according to body weight strata). Blood samples were obtained prior to administration, 2, 4, and 6h after the start of administration on dose 1. Busulfan analysis was carried out by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and data analysed using a NONMEM population pharmacokinetic approach.

Results: Busulfan plasma concentrations obtained from 38 patients receiving IV busulfan and 25 patients receiving oral busulfan, were fitted simultaneously using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Lower variability in drug exposure was observed following IV administration, with a mean busulfan area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 1146 ± 187 μM.min (range 838-1622), as compared to 953 ± 290 μM.min (range 434-1427) following oral busulfan. A total of 87% of children treated with IV busulfan achieved AUC values within the target of 900-1500 μM.min versus 56% of patients following oral busulfan. Busulfan AUC values were significantly higher in HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial patients who experienced hepatic toxicity or veno-occlusive disease (VOD) (1177 ± 189 μM.min versus 913 ± 256 μM.min; p=0.0086). Further stratification based on route of administration suggested that the incidence of hepatic toxicity was related to both high busulfan AUC and oral drug administration.

Conclusion: The reduced pharmacokinetic variability and improved control of busulfan AUC observed following IV administration support its utility within the ongoing HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial.

Citing Articles

Drug-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome: current advances and future perspectives.

Yu Z, Li W, Tian C, Cao Y, Zhang C Arch Toxicol. 2024; 99(3):835-850.

PMID: 39718593 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03950-9.


Riluzole Reverses Blood-Testis Barrier Loss to Rescue Chemotherapy-Induced Male Infertility by Binding to TRPC.

Huang R, Xia H, Lin W, Wang Z, Li L, Deng J Cells. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39682764 PMC: 11640501. DOI: 10.3390/cells13232016.


Management of Busulfan-Induced Lung Injury in Pediatric Patients with High-Risk Neuroblastoma.

Castelli S, Thorwarth A, van Schewick C, Wendt A, Astrahantseff K, Szymansky A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39408056 PMC: 11477708. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195995.


A practical guide to therapeutic drug monitoring in busulfan: recommendations from the Pharmacist Committee of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

Domingos V, Nezvalova-Henriksen K, Dadkhah A, Moreno-Martinez M, Ben Hassine K, Pires V Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024; 59(12):1641-1653.

PMID: 39271948 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02413-0.


Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Intravenous Busulfan in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Comparative Simulations.

Takahashi T, Jaber M, Brown S, Al-Kofahi M Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023; 62(7):955-968.

PMID: 37415003 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01275-x.