Computationally Derived Image Signature of Stromal Morphology Is Prognostic of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Following Prostatectomy in African American Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Between 30%-40% of patients with prostate cancer experience disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Existing clinical models for recurrence risk prediction do not account for population-based variation in the tumor phenotype, despite recent evidence suggesting the presence of a unique, more aggressive prostate cancer phenotype in African American (AA) patients. We investigated the capacity of digitally measured, population-specific phenotypes of the intratumoral stroma to create improved models for prediction of recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Experimental Design: This study included 334 radical prostatectomy patients subdivided into training (V, = 127), validation 1 (V, = 62), and validation 2 (V, = 145). Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from resected prostates were digitized, and 242 quantitative descriptors of the intratumoral stroma were calculated using a computational algorithm. Machine learning and elastic net Cox regression models were constructed using V to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival based on these features. Performance of these models was assessed using V and V, both overall and in population-specific cohorts.
Results: An AA-specific, automated stromal signature, AAstro, was prognostic of recurrence risk in both independent validation datasets [V: AUC = 0.87, HR = 4.71 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.65-13.4), = 0.003; V: AUC = 0.77, HR = 5.7 (95% CI, 1.48-21.90), = 0.01]. AAstro outperformed clinical standard Kattan and CAPRA-S nomograms, and the underlying stromal descriptors were strongly associated with IHC measurements of specific tumor biomarker expression levels.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that considering population-specific information and stromal morphology has the potential to substantially improve accuracy of prognosis and risk stratification in AA patients with prostate cancer.
Flannery B, Sandler H, Lal P, Feldman M, Santa-Rosario J, Pathak T J Pathol. 2024; 265(2):146-157.
PMID: 39660731 PMC: 11717490. DOI: 10.1002/path.6373.
Deciphering the Tumor Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer: A Focus on the Stromal Component.
Pakula H, Pederzoli F, Fanelli G, Nuzzo P, Rodrigues S, Loda M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(21).
PMID: 39518123 PMC: 11544791. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213685.
Ten challenges and opportunities in computational immuno-oncology.
Bao R, Hutson A, Madabhushi A, Jonsson V, Rosario S, Barnholtz-Sloan J J Immunother Cancer. 2024; 12(10).
PMID: 39461879 PMC: 11529678. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009721.
A New Era of Data-Driven Cancer Research and Care: Opportunities and Challenges.
Gomez F, Danos A, Del Fiol G, Madabhushi A, Tiwari P, McMichael J Cancer Discov. 2024; 14(10):1774-1778.
PMID: 39363742 PMC: 11463721. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-1130.
PatchSorter: a high throughput deep learning digital pathology tool for object labeling.
Walker C, Talawalla T, Toth R, Ambekar A, Rea K, Chamian O NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):164.
PMID: 38902336 PMC: 11190251. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01150-4.