» Articles » PMID: 32133688

Sample Size and Power Calculations for Open Cohort Longitudinal Cluster Randomized Trials

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32133688
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed cohort, and another is that each participant provides only one measurement during the course of the trial. However some studies have an "open cohort" sampling structure, where participants may provide measurements in variable numbers of periods. To date, sample size calculations for longitudinal cluster randomized trials have not accommodated open cohorts. Feldman and McKinlay (1994) provided some guidance, stating that the participant-level autocorrelation could be varied to account for the degree of overlap in different periods of the study, but did not indicate precisely how to do so. We present sample size and power formulas that allow for open cohorts and discuss the impact of the degree of "openness" on sample size and power. We consider designs where the number of participants in each cluster will be maintained throughout the trial, but individual participants may provide differing numbers of measurements. Our results are a unification of closed cohort and repeated cross-sectional sample results of Hooper et al (2016), and indicate precisely how participant autocorrelation of Feldman and McKinlay should be varied to account for an open cohort sampling structure. We discuss different types of open cohort sampling schemes and how open cohort sampling structure impacts on power in the presence of decaying within-cluster correlations and autoregressive participant-level errors.

Citing Articles

Designing stepped wedge trials to evaluate physical activity interventions in schools: methodological considerations.

Salway R, House D, Kent-Saisch S, Walker R, Emm-Collison L, Porter A Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025; 22(1):22.

PMID: 40001100 PMC: 11863484. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-025-01720-z.


Optimal design of cluster randomized crossover trials with a continuous outcome: Optimal number of time periods and treatment switches under a fixed number of clusters or fixed budget.

Moerbeek M Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(8):8820-8830.

PMID: 39271634 PMC: 11525278. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02505-1.


Maintaining the validity of inference from linear mixed models in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials under misspecified random-effects structures.

Ouyang Y, Taljaard M, Forbes A, Li F Stat Methods Med Res. 2024; 33(9):1497-1516.

PMID: 38807552 PMC: 11499024. DOI: 10.1177/09622802241248382.


Researchers' experiences of the design and conduct challenges associated with parallel-group cluster-randomised trials and views on a novel open-cohort design.

Surr C, Marsden L, Griffiths A, Cox S, Fossey J, Martin A PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0297184.

PMID: 38394190 PMC: 10889884. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297184.


Does it decay? Obtaining decaying correlation parameter values from previously analysed cluster randomised trials.

Kasza J, Bowden R, Ouyang Y, Taljaard M, Forbes A Stat Methods Med Res. 2023; 32(11):2123-2134.

PMID: 37589088 PMC: 10683336. DOI: 10.1177/09622802231194753.


References
1.
Kasza J, Hooper R, Copas A, Forbes A . Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials. Stat Med. 2020; . PMC: 7217159. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8519. View

2.
Grantham K, Kasza J, Heritier S, Hemming K, Forbes A . Accounting for a decaying correlation structure in cluster randomized trials with continuous recruitment. Stat Med. 2019; 38(11):1918-1934. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8089. View

3.
Feldman H, McKinlay S . Cohort versus cross-sectional design in large field trials: precision, sample size, and a unifying model. Stat Med. 1994; 13(1):61-78. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780130108. View

4.
Hooper R, Teerenstra S, de Hoop E, Eldridge S . Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials. Stat Med. 2016; 35(26):4718-4728. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7028. View

5.
Li F . Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure. Stat Med. 2019; 39(4):438-455. PMC: 7027591. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8415. View