» Articles » PMID: 32131824

External Facilitators' Perceptions of Internal Facilitation Skills During Implementation of Collaborative Care for Mental Health Teams: a Qualitative Analysis Informed by the I-PARIHS Framework

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32131824
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Facilitation is a key strategy that may contribute to successful implementation of healthcare innovations. In blended facilitation, external facilitators (EFs) guide and support internal facilitators (IFs) in directing implementation processes. Developers of the i-PARIHS framework propose that successful facilitation requires project management, team/process, and influencing/negotiating skills. It is unclear what IF skills are most important in real-world settings, which could inform recruitment and training efforts. As prior qualitative studies of IF skills have only interviewed IFs, the perspectives of their EF partners are needed. Furthermore, little is known regarding the distribution of implementation tasks between IFs and EFs, which could impact sustainability once external support is removed. In the context of an implementation trial, we therefore: 1) evaluated IFs' use of i-PARIHS facilitation skills, from EFs' perspectives; 2) identified attributes of IFs not encompassed within the i-PARIHS skills; and 3) investigated the relative contributions of IFs and EFs during facilitation.

Methods: Analyses were conducted within a hybrid type II trial utilizing blended facilitation to implement the collaborative chronic care model within mental health teams of nine VA medical centers. Each site committed one team and an IF to weekly process design meetings and additional implementation activities over 12 months. Three EFs worked with three sites each. Following study completion, the EFs completed semi-structured qualitative interviews reflecting on the facilitation process, informed by the i-PARIHS facilitation skill areas. Interviews were analyzed via directed content analysis.

Results: EFs emphasized the importance of IFs having strong project management, team/process, and influencing/negotiating skills. Prior experience in these areas and a mental health background were also benefits. Personal characteristics (e.g., flexible, assertive) were described as critical, particularly when faced with conflict. EFs discussed the importance of clear delineation of EF/IF roles, and the need to shift facilitation responsibilities to IFs.

Conclusions: Key IF skills, according to EFs, are aligned with i-PARIHS recommendations, but IFs' personal characteristics were also emphasized as important factors. Findings highlight traits to consider when selecting IFs and potential training areas (e.g., conflict management). EFs and IFs must determine an appropriate distribution of facilitation tasks to ensure long-term sustainability of practices.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, September 7, 2015, #NCT02543840.

Citing Articles

Enablers and Barriers to an Experience-Based Co-Design Process to Develop Service Improvements in Enhanced Community Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study.

ODonoghue F, ODonnell M, Griffin T, Fahy E, Newell E, Creaven A Health Expect. 2025; 28(2):e70206.

PMID: 40072255 PMC: 11898217. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70206.


Combined use of the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework with other implementation frameworks: a systematic review.

Hunter S, Morgillo S, Kim B, Bergstrom A, Ehrenberg A, Eldh A Implement Sci Commun. 2025; 6(1):25.

PMID: 40051001 PMC: 11887334. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-025-00704-1.


How can a community of practice support healthcare professionals navigating new roles? a case study of genetic counsellors employed to work in medical specialities.

Do T, McEwen A, Martyn M, Gaff C, Dawson-McClaren B BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):314.

PMID: 40001148 PMC: 11863419. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12440-2.


Internal Facilitation by Health Assistants for the "WHO Lay Health Worker Dementia Care" in Rural Uganda: A Formative Evaluation.

Wakida E, Obua C, Rukundo G, Samantha M, Maling S, Karungi C J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025; 18:579-590.

PMID: 39931648 PMC: 11807774. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S507819.


Evaluating a virtual facilitation workshop with antimicrobial stewardship teams within a cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial.

Malone S, Bono K, Saito J, Rangel S, Liu J, Newland J BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1263.

PMID: 39434072 PMC: 11492772. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11714-5.


References
1.
Kirchner J, Ritchie M, Pitcock J, Parker L, Curran G, Fortney J . Outcomes of a partnered facilitation strategy to implement primary care-mental health. J Gen Intern Med. 2014; 29 Suppl 4:904-12. PMC: 4239280. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3027-2. View

2.
Kilbourne A, Neumann M, Pincus H, Bauer M, Stall R . Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci. 2007; 2:42. PMC: 2248206. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-42. View

3.
Ritchie M, Parker L, Edlund C, Kirchner J . Using implementation facilitation to foster clinical practice quality and adherence to evidence in challenged settings: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):294. PMC: 5397744. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2217-0. View

4.
Kotecha J, Han H, Green M, Russell G, Martin M, Birtwhistle R . The role of the practice facilitators in Ontario primary healthcare quality improvement. BMC Fam Pract. 2015; 16:93. PMC: 4520205. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0298-6. View

5.
Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View